Luxury Institute News

May 20, 2013

Richemont’s Asia focus drives full-year sales up 14pc

By Erin Shea
Luxury Daily
May 17, 2013

Richemont is attributing its full-year sales increase to demand in China and Asia-Pacific, contributions from currencies and exchange rates and the broad growth from its brands across all regions.

Luxury conglomerate Richemont reported a 14 percent increase in annual sales to approximately $13 billion in 2012, compared to last year’s sales of $11.4 billion.

Richemont also reported that its profits for the year are up 30 percent to $2.6 billion from $2 billion in the previous year, much of which can be attributed to the sales in Asia-Pacific. The conglomerate released its results May 16 for the fiscal year that ended March 31.

“The Chinese and the Asians have a very healthy appetite for jewelry,” said Milton Pedraza, CEO of The Luxury Institute, New York.

“I think that ready-to-wear products may be oversaturated [in Asia], and handbags may be oversaturated, so watches and jewelry tend to be valuable,” he said.

“There are some companies in luxury that continue to grow, despite the global economy.”

Mr. Pedraza is not affiliated with Richemont, but agreed to comment as an industry expert.

Richemont, which was not able to comment directly, owns a number of luxury brands including Vacheron Constantin, Jaeger-LeCoultre, Baume & Mercier, A. Lange & Söhne, Cartier, IWC, Piaget, Alfred Dunhill, Van Cleef & Arpels, Montblanc, Chloé and Roger Dubuis.

Asian expansion
Richemont attributes its sales results to an increased demand in China and Asia-Pacific, contributions from currencies and exchange rates and the broad growth from its brands across all regions.

The company said that it works on a long-term basis of benefiting from the prestige and heritage of its brands, which will continue in the future.

However in the short-term, Richemont said that economic troubles may impact consumer confidence in some markets. Overall, the conglomerate is cautiously optimistic about the future.

During this past fiscal year, Richemont reported that Asia-Pacific accounted for the majority of its sales, with 41 percent of the group’s total sales coming from that area. Hong Kong and mainland China are its two largest markets.

Europe, including the Middle East and Africa, was responsible for 36 percent of Richemont’s overall sales.The conglomerate says this area’s growth was a result of demands from tourists.The Americas region had a third consecutive year of double-digit growth. This year, it accounted for 15 percent of group sales.Compared to other regions, Asia-Pacific is the area that is leading Richemont’s growth.

“Asia-Pacific is still a vibrant part of the world and there are some companies that are doing well there,” Mr. Pedraza said.

“Some brands are doing a fantastic job in that area,” he said. “Richemont is doing a fantastic job.”

Retail v. wholesale
Another aspect responsible for Richemont’s growth is its individual brands’ focus on retail over wholesale.

Cartier boutique

For the Asia Pacific and Europe, Richemont reports that its brand’s own boutiques had the highest growth rates.

In Asia, the brand boutiques had higher sales growth than the company’s wholesale partners. This is in part due to the expansion of the boutiques in the region.

“Richemont has set out over the last few years to try to keep its own distribution,” Mr. Pedraza said.

“Retail is outselling wholesale, which can help a company grow faster,” he said. “You can have faster growth when you are de-emphasizing wholesale and emphasizing retail.

“Most luxury brands want to control their own distribution. Watch brands tend to be more retail-oriented.”

http://www.luxurydaily.com/richemont-sales-up-14pc-in-2012/

April 6, 2011

Location, Location, Location

By Simon Brooke
Sphere Magazine
Spring 2011

Luxury Consumers used to prefer their favorite shops, brands and services reassuringly uniform, wherever they were in the world. But not anymore. High-end brands are turning away from global messages to imbue their products with a sense of place…

…Luxury has become very standardized, agrees Milton Pedraza, CEO of New York-based consultancy Luxury Institute. “You can often buy many of the same thing in London and Bangkok but luxury customers are always looking for something new and exclusive to buy or to experience,” he says. Brands will produce their classic collections, available worldwide, but then there will be additional products available in just one location.”

These location-exclusive items “will connect more emotionally with the customer,” believes Pedraza. Developing and manufacturing these items is more expensive but luxury groups can afford this outlay. “They can produce handcrafted products from local artisans, which increasingly what luxury customers are looking for,” he says. “There’s more opportunity here to be creative and to continue de-emphasis of the label. I believe people will pay extra for these pieces.”…

Click the link to read the entire article that starts on page 38: http://edition.pagesuite-professional.co.uk/launch.aspx?referral=mypagesuite&pnum=&refresh=T0x98P1ok17C&EID=653aafca-aa62-4659-baf2-3ee0db222659&skip=

October 29, 2010

Exclusive Invitation

The Paris Biennale – an event dedicated to the finest art and antiques in the world – has once again wowed jewellery lovers by playing host to an eye-popping abundance of jewels with price tags in the millions, says Claire Adler

By Claire Adler
Canary Wharf
October 2010

This September, Paris saw jewellery presented to the super-rich and connoisseurs on supremely elaborate exhibition stands. It was all part of the Paris Biennale – the bi-annual invitee-only art and antiques fair – which recently took place for the 25th time, in the palatial setting of the Grand Palais.

The Paris Biennale des Antiquaires is the most prestigious fine art and antiques fair in the world. First held in 1962, the exhibition’s original organisers hoped the beauty of the objects on show would rival the beauty of the women who came along to ogle them.

French jeweller Cartier has been an exhibitor since the show’s beginnings, while this year Chanel, Van Cleef & Arpels showed for the third time, and Dior for the second time. Harry Winston is the only American jeweller at the show, but with a shop in Paris since 1955, it first exhibited at the Paris Biennale in 1974, then again 2000 and has been a regular ever since.

“The Paris Biennale is a rendezvous of all the world’s jewellery connoisseurs,” said CEO of Harry Winston, Frederic de Narp, before the show opened. “As a French person, I’m thrilled to be part of it. We have 20 salons round the world, but this is where we’re launching our newest collection, the Royal Garden collection, and we’ll meet with all our important clients here.”

When it comes to the rarest, most exquisitely crafted and precious jewellery on the planet, it’s all very much a ‘by appointment, guest list only, price on application’ affair.

Behind the scenes information is hard to come by, but at the same event two years ago, jewellery transported by Harry Winston alone was said to be worth £50 million, though it may easily have been more.

This year, Chanel’s most expensive piece on show was the intricate Plume necklace, for sale at a cool €1.6 million, along with the matching brooch – yours for €220,000.

The Plume, or feather, is a variation on a theme originally dreamed up by Mademoiselle Chanel for the launch of her very first fine jewellery collection in 1932. The brooch might be a tad expensive, but it’s certainly versatile. The experts say it can be worn over a shoulder, as a sparkling headdress, or pinned onto a hat or a (inevitably Chanel) skirt suit.

Over at Van Cleef & Arpels, certain individual pieces just skirted the €3 million mark, with some jewels having already been snapped up by July time, based on drawings alone. Dior’s display included pieces designed up to 11 years ago, including delectable, intricate cocktail rings by Dior designer Victoire de Castellane, from her collection Les Incroyables et les Merveilleuses, made in 1999, which went on to spark a trend for enormous, bold and beautiful rings.

Chanel upped the ante this year by filling a booth twice the size of the space it took in 2008, and bringing in New York architect Peter Marino to design it. Marino is the man behind Louis Vuitton’s Bond Street flagship store, which opened early this summer.

Meanwhile, the display of this year’s Van Cleef & Arpels collection, Les Voyages Extraordinaires, inspired by the books of Jules Verne, bore a far greater resemblance to a fantastical art installation than any display you’d expect to see at an antiques fair. But that was hardly surprising, given that Alfredo Arias – the Argentinian artist, actor and director who had created it – has conceived sets for opera houses from La Scala in Milan to the Opera in Paris, and is the proud owner of a five-page CV enumerating his books, films and fantastical theatre productions, as well as the accolades he has received in Italy, Argentina and France. This includes the multiple French honour of being appointed Chevalier, Officier and Commandeur des Arts et des Lettres.

“I would not miss this occasion, which is a high-level artistic event, for anything in the world. Jewellery is an art form,” said Arias.

“The dreamlike world of Jules Verne resonates with that of a Maison whose artistic heritage is built around the beauty of flora and fauna, the sky and the stars, imaginary creatures,” said Nicolas Bos, creative director of Van Cleef & Arpels.

One question remains. Is there a market for this extraordinary and outrageously expensive jewellery? New York-based luxury expert, CEO of the Luxury Institute Milton Pedraza believes there is: “There will always be a market for these products and especially in Greater China, India and the Middle East, where wealth continues to grow. Wealthy people just want the best and they will pay for it. The concept is an old one with new price levels,” he says.

http://issuu.com/runwildmedia/docs/cw_oct_10_combined

August 2, 2010

Mining the Glitter

Janet Whitman, Financial Post · Saturday, Jul. 31, 2010

NEW YORK — About a decade ago, Bob Gannicott, a prospector and geologist by trade, walked in the doors of Harry Winston Inc.’s flagship salon on Manhattan’s Fifth Avenue and made a rare and unexpected discovery: The iconic diamond business known as the “jeweller to the stars” was for sale.

Mr. Gannicott was only hoping to work out a partnership with the ultra-luxury diamond retailer to help glean better price information for the hundreds of millions of dollars worth of rough diamonds his firm, Canada-based Aber Diamond Corp., was about to start hauling from a mine in an Arctic lake 300 kilometres north of Yellowknife.

But with cash set to roll in from the mine – one of the richest diamond finds in the world – the idea of owning the upper-crust jeweller outright was starting to make sense, Mr. Gannicott said.

He was coming to realize, after a previous pact with Tiffany & Co. failed to pan out, that the only way a rough diamond marketer like his company was going to secure price information on finished diamonds would be to own a retailer outright.

An acrimonious two-decade family feud between two brothers – Ron and Bruce Winston, who were heirs to the company’s eponymous founder – had made some sort of sale or investment a necessity.

The deal took a few years to crystallize but by 2004, Aber had closed on an acquisition for a 51% stake in Harry Winston for US$85-million. In 2006, the diamond maverick bought the remaining 49% for US$157-million.

The strategy has paid off in part: Aber, which in 2007 renamed itself Harry Winston Diamond Corp., has transformed itself from a junior prospector into a high-end diamond marketer that fetches some of the richest rough diamond prices in world.

Things haven’t gone so smoothly on the retail end, however.

Some investors and analysts complain that the Harry Winston retail business – which made its name as red-carpet staple for Hollywood A-listers like Gwyneth Paltrow, Madonna and Halle Berry – has done nothing but lose money, dragging down the mining company’s overall bottom line.

While some are hoping the company will cut its losses and spin off the retail business, Mr. Gannicott defended the unlikely acquisition, saying it is performing as expected and would have turned in a robust profit in 2009 were it not for the financial crisis that gripped the world in 2008.

“We never intended to draw earnings out of this early on,” Mr. Gannicott, the 63-year-old chairman and chief executive of Harry Winston Diamond Corp., told the Financial Post. “We could have just said we’ll leave it at five stores, spend a bit of money on marketing and let it throw off a few million a year…. The idea was to grow it into an international business that, in time, would be worth significantly more value and generate significant earnings.”

Mr. Gannicott, who got his start in the business as a miner when he left his native England for Yellowknife at the age of 19, said the Harry Winston business seemed barely touched since the late 1970s, when the company’s namesake founder died. “The company became like a Sleeping Beauty castle. It’s a good thing nothing silly was done with it, like a perfume line.”

Expanding the retail business is not unlike mining, he added. “When you spend money on exploration, it comes straight off your bottom line. What we’re focused on at Harry Winston is not to take profits now, but to grow it in a sound manner.”

When Aber first took a stake in Harry Winston, the jeweller had six salons: two in the United States, two in Europe and two in Japan. Under its new ownership, it expanded to 19 salons, with six new U.S. locations and three more in Japan, as well as four locations in other parts of Asia – a region that’s expected to see a surge in demand in the coming years.

The company plans to nearly double its store count by 2016 to 35.

To revive its stagnant product lines and marketing efforts, Mr. Gannicott in January hired Frederic de Narp, who headed rival luxury jeweller Cartier’s North American division, as the new chief executive of its retail business.

Mr. de Narp proposed a five-year plan for his new boss that puts the business on a path toward turning an annual profit of 10% through the introduction of new products, jewellery collections, brighter lines and additional watches lines.

“The world has come out of a dark place in the last two years,” the Brittany native told Harry Winston investors at the company’s annual meeting at Toronto’s Fairmont Royal York Hotel in June. “And the market conditions today are right for Harry Winston.”

With only an estimated 15% of the US$150-billion in global jewellery sales spent on branded jewellery, the opportunity for Harry Winston, one of the most prestigious names in the business, is huge, he said.

Mr. de Narp also noted that while demand for jewellery and high-end watches is increasing, local jewellers are being forced to close their doors because of the financial crisis. “Where do they go if those local jewellers close every day? They will go to Harry Winston,” he said.

In a move that will help fund its retail expansion, Harry Winston announced last week that it’s buying back a stake in its rich Diavik diamond mine that it was forced to sell in March 2009 to avoid going under amid the financial crisis.

The purchase from Kinross Gold Corp. – which made the Toronto-based gold producer a handsome profit – will restore Harry Winston’s 40% stake in the mine and give its cash flow a nice boost.

Harry Winston owns the development – Canada’s largest diamond mine – with international mining behemoth Rio Tinto.

Part of the draw for investing in retail is that the mine is a depleting asset and could be exhausted in 12 years, while the retail business can keep expanding as world demand grows.

Trying to strike it rich with another mine would be a huge gamble. Mr. Gannicott noted that since 1870, in the history of diamond exploration, 5,000 kimberlites – the volcanic rock best known for carrying diamonds – have been discovered, 850 of which contain diamonds, and only 50 of which were economically viable to mine.

In sharp contrast, the gold industry discovered 1,025 viable mines in the same period.

Still, Mr. Gannicott isn’t ruling out hitting on another mining development.

One potential target, according to some industry analysts, is Toronto-based Mountain Provinces Diamond Inc. It’s main asset is a 44% stake in Gahcho Kue, one of Canada’s largest diamond deposits and the largest diamond mine under development around the world.

“We talk all of the time, but it’s a question of value,” said Mr. Gannicott. “Its share price is already substantial.”

Investing in retail gives the company a chance to participate in the two most lucrative ends of the business: selling rough diamonds and finished jewellery.

Mr. Gannicott originally thought its Diavik diamonds could be sold directly to its Harry Winston salons and made into fine jewellery in the Fifth Avenue townhouse that is home to its flagship store.

But the Canadian government frowns on such transactions, preferring instead that the rough diamonds be sold on the open market to ensure it gets the maximum tax windfall. “They prefer arms-length sales,” said Mr. Gannicott.

Some analysts and investors would prefer the company give up on retail and focus on the part of the diamond business that’s given it the most success and the highest profits.

“If the retail part contributed zero you could ignore that and focus on the mine part of the business, but the fact is, historically, it’s been a negative contributor to earnings,” said John Hughes, a Toronto-based analyst with Desjardins Securities Inc. “It’s taken away from what the mine has done.”

Mr. Hughes had a “buy” rating on Harry Winston’s stock, but downgraded it to “sell” a few months ago after the shares zoomed above $10.

The stock’s had a huge run since, sinking to a low of $2.62 last year before Kinross came to the rescue and took a stake in the company.

It ended regular trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange on Friday at $12.74 a share.

“It’s an expensive stock by all measures unless you assume there’s a sustained turnaround in the retail business,” said Mr. Hughes. “I’m not willing to ask my clients to take that risk, given the history of consistent operating losses. I don’t think there are any quick fixes for the retail business.”

John Kaiser, an independent analyst and editor of the Kaiser Bottom-Fishing Report, said that owning the Harry Winston salons will give the company a longer life beyond when the Diavik mine is depleted. But he’d also like to see the company invest in another mine, such as the Gahcho Kue. “It’s a natural,” he said.

Mr. Kaiser said he advised his readers to buy the stock after Kinross took a stake in the company and he’s now mulling whether to remove that recommendation now that the shares have had such a spectacular run-up.

While Wall Street might be skeptical of the Canadian miner’s retail ambitions, others see strong upside for the brand, which was almost frozen in time as the Winston brothers squabbled over their fortune.

Milton Pedraza, chief executive of the Luxury Institute, a research firm that follows the industry, said that long-term prospects for the Harry Winston brand are very good, based on his surveys of the super rich with individual net worth of US$5-million or more.

“I can say, ‘My dear darling, I just bought you a diamond from 47th Street,’ ” a district in midtown Manhattan well known for its row of diamond wholesalers, Mr. Pedraza said. “Or I can say it came from Harry Winston or Cartier. That will have far higher value psychologically, even if it has the same carats.”

http://www.financialpost.com/news/Mining+glitter/3343862/story.html