Luxury Institute News

August 22, 2011

Luxury (Now) Within Reach

Makers of high-end goods are trying new tactics to attract budget buyers.

By Kelli B. Grant
SmartMoney
August 19, 2011

While the market upheaval and economic uncertainty has encouraged many people to tighten their budgets, shoppers lusting after that “it” bag, a first-class airline seat or a pricey car may now find those luxuries are more affordable than before.

Companies that make or sell high-end goods are increasingly aiming for what they call aspiration buyers — middle-class shoppers who can afford to occasionally splurge. The tactics are vast, including pitching less-expensive product lines, selling overstock online and allowing consumers to buy luxury perks in lieu of earning them. Audi, for example, is rewarding brand loyalty by offering $1,000 to $3,000 cash-back to households that already own an Audi and want another one. In September, eBay  will team up with Nieman Marcus and other luxury e-tailers to sell goods at discounts of up to 65%. And new credit cards from Amercian Airlines  and United offer a cheaper buy-in for perks previously available only to elite road warriors and big spenders. “Luxury has become more democratized these days, and everyone wants access,” says Milton Pedraza, the president of Luxury Institute LLC, a marketing firm.

Click the link to read the entire article which includes additional quotes from Milton Pedraza, CEO of Luxury Institute: http://www.smartmoney.com/spend/deal-of-the-day/how-to-buy-luxury-goods-at-a-discount-1313705085759/?link=SM_hp_middle_optStory

December 18, 2010

Countering counterfeits: How luxury brands are challenging the knock-off culture

By Rachel Lamb
Luxury Daily
December 17, 2010

Prestige brands continue their epochal battle against piracy and counterfeiting in hopes of stemming both lost revenue and tarnished brand equity.

Louis Vuitton, Tiffany & Co. and Fendi are just a few of the brands in wars against those selling – or permitting the sale of – knock-off items that look like luxury goods. The results of such counterfeits are damaging to luxury brands, both in terms of sales and brand equity.

“The biggest risk is certainly the concern of reputational damage,” said Milton Pedraza, CEO of the Luxury Institute, New York. “People will see a knock-off that looks a lot like a luxury item, and they’ll be put off by the fact that it’s not great quality, or the craftsmanship is poor.

“Luxury items obviously have great craftsmanship and have high standards, but consumers don’t always know that the items are counterfeit,” he said.

Damage done
A luxury brand’s most valuable asset is its status – it is known for its heritage, its quality of work, the quality of materials it uses and its price.

However, counterfeit items are almost always shoddily made. Although they may look the same, the materials are of poor quality and the high standards of which luxury brands pride themselves are gone.

This is damaging to a brand’s status in the luxury sector because unknowing consumers will assume that the knock-offs are real, and that all items made by the actual luxury brand are not worth the price.

“All popular brands and types of luxury manufacturers are susceptible to counterfeiting,” said Mark Rosenberg, intellectual property attorney at Sills, Cummis and Gross PC, New York. “It is pure economics. The greater the demand for a particular brand, the greater the incentive for counterfeiters to knock-off that brand.”

Another obvious concern is the economic dip that brands take when consumers buy pirated items instead of luxury ones.

“From an economic standpoint, the longer economy remains relatively stagnant and discretionary income limited, the more likely it is that consumers desiring luxury goods will consider purchasing a less expensive counterfeit,” said Mr. Rosenberg.

“This is particularly true where sophisticated counterfeiters are able to produce knock-offs that are nearly indistinguishable from the genuine product.”

What can be done?
Insofar as legal action, there is only so much that brands can do.

EBay has been sued for selling counterfeit goods mimicking Louis Vuitton, Dior, Gucci, Kenzo and Guerlain.

Upscale jewelry designer Tiffany & Co. even tried to sue eBay for not properly monitoring the buying and selling of knock-off goods trying to pass off as luxury jewelry.

However, the Supreme Court refused to  hear Tiffany’s case, dealing a blow to luxury brands who had hoped to stifle piracy on the Internet.

“The greatest challenge facing luxury brands is the fallout from the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in the Tiffany & Co. vs. eBay case,” said Sills, Cummis’ Mr. Rosenberg. “That case places the burden of policing the Internet for counterfeits squarely on the shoulders of brand owners.”

“At the same time, that case absolves Web sites that permit third party sales such as eBay and Amazon.com of the responsibility to proactively police their own Web sites for obvious counterfeiting.”

Likewise, Fendi also took legal action against Burlington Coat Factory, when the former claimed its goods were being impersonated and sold.

“As far as legal battles go, sometimes [luxury brands] can do something, and sometimes they can’t,” the Luxury Institute’s Mr. Pedraza said.

“It’s hard for law enforcement to try to clamp down on something as huge as this, especially when so much money is involved,” he said.

While the Supreme Court found eBay not liable in the Tiffany & Co. case, Fendi won $10 million from its lawsuit.

Street sales, however, are an entirely different problem.

Brands can pressure law enforcement to try to crack down on fake luxury item street vendors, but the business is never going to be completely shut down.

There are always going to be people willing to sell and buy luxury items.

“The business is too profitable and too lucrative for vendors to stop selling pirated items,” Mr. Pedraza said. “Surreptitious people are always going to find opportunities.”

He also suggested strength in numbers. Almost every luxury brand is fighting a battle against knock-offs, and cooperation and collaboration across the globe is key.

Benefits of real luxury
With all of the much cheaper counterfeit products, it can be difficult for luxury brands to persuade consumers to buy the real deal, even though the prices are considerably higher.

“Luxury designers actually have a lot going for them,” Mr. Pedraza said. “They have heritage, quality, excellent craftsmanship and design and have a chance to build their Web sites and retail stores to reflect their image.”

While this may seem like a simple tactic, elegance and status are the things that set apart luxury brands from others.

Furthermore, many upscale brands have failed to make their Web sites easy to use and ecommerce friendly, or to build Facebook and Twitter accounts.

By adopting a more visible digital profile, high-end marketers could stimy efforts by counterfeiters trying to steal the ecommerce spotlight.

However, the most important thing that a luxury brand can do to fight knock-offs is to emphasize customer service.

This is almost a requirement when charging premium prices. A luxury brand needs to let people embrace more than just the product. Consumers should be able to embrace the brand itself.

“Why would a consumer want to go into a retail store to spend a lot of money and not be treated well?” Mr. Pedraza said. “Luxury brands need to make sure the people working in their stores are knowledgeable, friendly and reflect the brand’s values.”

“Consumers need to feel special and want to pay more money for a premium product,” he said. “If a brand wants its products sold, the experience needs to be dramatically different than anything a customer has ever had.”

http://www.luxurydaily.com/piracy-and-counterfeit-an-ongoing-battle-for-luxury-brands/

December 2, 2010

Supreme Court deals blow to luxury claims against online counterfeit sales

By Peter Finocchiaro
Luxury Daily
December 1, 2010

Luxury brands hoping for greater legal support for combating the sale of counterfeit goods online were dealt a blow as the United States Supreme Court declined to hear Tiffany & Co.’s trademark infringement lawsuit against eBay to effectively place the onus of counterfeit enforcement on brands.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals had previously ruled that manufacturers are responsible for reporting cases of trademark infringement to eBay. The ruling will make it harder for luxury brands to combat counterfeiting online as sites that allow third-party sales account for tens of billions of dollars in commerce each year, according to one legal expert.

“What the Supreme Court has done by refusing to hear the appeal is place the onus on brands as opposed to Web sites hosting or providing counterfeit sales, “said Mark Rosenberg, intellectual property attorney at Sills Cummis & Gross PC, New York.

“The Appeals Court decision basically says that if eBay is not aware of the infringement, they cannot be held liable for the counterfeiting, which is relatively simplistic,” he said.

“EBay has not affirmative duty to see what’s going on – it’s silly.”

Court ruling
Tiffany originally filed its suit against eBay in 2004, seeking damages for the sale of counterfeit goods on the auction site.

A U.S. district court found that  eBay could not be held accountable because it did not intentionally induce anyone to infringe upon Tiffany’s trademark and because it lacked specific knowledge of infringement by any seller, according to Andy Lustigman, attorney at law and principal of The Lustigman Firm, New York.

Sills, Cummis & Gross’ Mr. Rosenberg said that eBay could conceivably develop an algorithm to detect suspicious items for sale based on the presence of keywords such as “faux” or “replica.”

However, the court ruling stops short of mandating such screening tactics.

EBay would likely lack the expertise to determine the presence of a counterfeit even if it did inspect every good on its site, according to Mr. Lustigman.

Therefore, the trademark holder has  to report infringement in order to legally oblige a Web site hosting such sales to remove the item in question.

EBay has argued that Tiffany’s legal challenges were not motivated by the threat of counterfeiting on the Web site, but by the prospect of legitimate branded items generating revenue for merchants in the second-hand market.

The online auction brand also noted that the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the trail court found that it exceeds legal requirements for fighting the sale of counterfeits on its Web site.

How to counteract counterfeits?
Web sites that allow third-party sales such as eBay and Amazon account for tens of billions of dollars in commerce each year.

Which begs the question: How can luxury manufacturers protect their brand equity and minimize the impact of counterfeit sales on such Web sites if the law places the burden of enforcement in their hands?

One solution is to do the actual grunt work of policing the sites in question and proactively investigate potential cases of infringement and counterfeiting.

“Luxury goods marketers must be vigilant in policing Internet sales of their products and to notify the parties that are facilitating the transactions of counterfeit products,” Mr. Lustigman said.

“Brands should be signing up for product alerts on major Internet sellers such as eBay, and inspecting the listings to determine if a product advertised appears to be genuine, taking into account the description, country of origin, quantity being offered, the distribution channel and other similar indicia,” he said.

“If a brand becomes aware that a product being listed in counterfeit, it should affirmatively notify the Internet seller of the infringement.”

However, another solution could be to increase the brand’s visibility and commerce presence on the Internet.

The issue of counterfeiting and trademark infringement arose in the first place in part because luxury brands have been so slow to adopt strong digital positions, according to Milton Pedraza, CEO of the Luxury Institute, New York.

By expanding out their presence on the Internet with fully realized ecommerce strategies, while leveraging channels such as social media to galvanize brand advocates against countefeiting practices.

“Luxury brands should be aggressive online,” Mr. Pedraza said. “It’s good for combating counterfeiting, [as well as] great commerce and what consumers want.”

http://www.luxurydaily.com/supreme-court-deals-blow-to-luxury-claims-against-online-counterfeit-sales/