Luxury Institute News

April 24, 2012

Wealthy U.S. Consumers Favor and Feel More Connected to Luxury Brands Offering a Mobile App

(NEW YORK) April 24, 2012 – The independent and objective New York City-based Luxury Institute, in cooperation with award-winning mobile marketing agency Plastic Mobile, surveyed affluent U.S. consumers about the growing connection between luxury and the emerging mobile market. The results of their research have just been released in the study, “Mobile Apps And Commerce for Luxury Brands.”

“Luxury brands must acknowledge the impact of technology advancements in the mobile space and find a humanistic way to connect and engage with their consumers through mobile,” says Milton Pedraza, CEO of Luxury Institute.

Gucci, Louis Vuitton, Saks Fifth Avenue, and Gilt Groupe are the most frequently downloaded apps by wealthy consumers who have luxury brand applications on their mobile device. Most affluent smartphone owners who are downloading luxury apps are using them to find information on products, services or brands (56%).

Almost all wealthy consumers who have used luxury brand apps report that they have had a good experience with the mobile apps (93%). In addition, 71% report that they feel better connected to luxury brands after downloading and/or using their applications and 64% view luxury brands that offer a mobile application more favorably than brands that do not.

The survey respondents indicate there are a number of features they expect from luxury brand applications and highlight loyalty programs (46%) and early access to sales (45%) as the most important.  In addition, providing sales professionals with a mobile application that can specify details about products (53%), have the ability to check for sizes and availability at other stores (50%) and in-store product inventory (47%) would enrich the luxury shopping experience for affluent consumers.

Of the 63% of wealthy consumers who have made a purchase through their mobile device, just under 20% have bought a luxury product or service. While preference for the in-store experience (45%) is why wealthy smartphone users have not yet fully embraced luxury mobile commerce, the majority of luxury consumers who choose to shop via mobile report that there is no upper monetary limit to how much they would spend (72%). This indicates a tremendous emerging opportunity for luxury brands to connect with consumers through mobile.

“Mobile has been receiving a lot attention in the retail space lately. The study suggests the mobile strategy for luxury brands must be about enhancing the in-store customer experience and using the platform to help strengthen customer relationships,” says Melody Adhami, President and COO of Plastic Mobile.

About Luxury Institute (www.LuxuryInstitute.com)
The Luxury Institute is the objective and independent global voice of the high net-worth consumer. The Institute conducts extensive and actionable research with wealthy consumers about their behaviors and attitudes on customer experience best practices. In addition, we work closely with top-tier luxury brands to successfully transform their organizational cultures into more profitable customer-centric enterprises. Our Luxury CRM Culture consulting process leverages our fact-based research and enables luxury brands to dramatically Outbehave as well as Outperform their competition. The Luxury Institute also operates LuxuryBoard.com, a membership-based online research portal, and the Luxury CRM Association, a membership organization dedicated to building customer-centric luxury enterprises.

About Plastic Mobile
Plastic Mobile is an award-winning mobile marketing agency of thinkers, artists, creators and builders with one common aspiration: to create extraordinary user experiences. Plastic Mobile is at the heart of the evolution of interactive mobile technology, pushing the boundaries and setting the bar for the standard of quality.

Known for many quality, first-in-kind mobile initiatives, Plastic Mobile delivers exceptional client service and highly customized mobile solutions for all platforms. With a diverse, high-profile client list, including Air Miles, Axe and Royal Le Page, they are the proud recipients of myriad awards, including the 15th annual Webby shopping award, “the Oscars of the Internet.” www.plasticmobile.com

January 26, 2012

Gilt Groupe’s woes may signify overall slump in flash-sale industry

By Kayla Hutzler
Luxury Daily
January 25, 2012

Luxury flash-sale site Gilt Groupe’s recent lay-offs and office closings are likely a result of overzealous growth but are also causing some experts to question the longevity of the flash-sale business model.

Gilt Groupe has announced that two major executives will be leaving the company, along with a rumored 80-90 additional employees from the company’s younger businesses, Gilt City and Gilt Taste. The question is, are the troubles at Gilt an indicator of the future of the flash-sales industry?

“I think one of the challenges for all flash Web sites is that they depend on discounting and, by nature, have lower margins than companies who sell full-price products,” said Milton Pedraza, president of the Luxury Institute, New York. “There is always a pressure on profitability.

“And number two is that as the luxury industry has experienced significant growth in the past few years and the luxury industry has tightened its inventory management, there is less supplies for what seeds the Gilt machines such as excess inventory,” he said.

Mr. Pedraza is not affiliated with Gilt Groupe, but agreed to comment as a third-party expert.

Shine’s off
Gilt Groupe made a statement earlier this week that John Auerbach, president of the group’s separate men’s brand Park & Bond, and Nate Richardson, head of Gilt City, will soon be leaving their respective positions.

The flash-sales company said that neither man was laid-off but that they both happened to choose this time to leave the company, according to a statement made to New York Magazine’s The Cut.

This announcement came only a day after rumors broke that Gilt Groupe would be laying off more than 100 of its 900 employees.

As of Monday at noon, a Gilt Groupe spokesperson stated to The Cut that the company had let go 80-90 employees, approximately 10 percent of its workforce, across its businesses. However, there were no more layoffs planned, per the company.

Gilt Groupe also closed six of its Gilt City offices including those in Philadelphia, San Diego, Houston, Seattle, Atlanta and Dallas. A central sales force will take over the work that was done in these offices.

“We have not been as successful in smaller markets and the resources they require take away from growing our core business,” the company said in a statement to Women’s Wear Daily.

Gilt said that December 2011 was its most successful month and that the restructuring is aimed at supporting the long-term goal of turning a profit by the end of this year, according to Gilt.

Gilt Groupe was founded in 2007 as a flash-sales site for luxury designers such as Alexander McQueen and Louis Vuitton.

In the past five years, the company grew rapidly opening similarly-flash focused sales sites Gilt Taste, Gilt Man, Jetsetter and Gilt City.

The company opened its first full-priced retail site, Park & Bond, this past June.

“While the company still seems to be keeping both of their new [business launches Park & Bond and Gilt City] going, I think that in time they may find they aren’t getting much return on their investment and shutter them both completely,” said Pam Danziger, president of Unity Marketing, Stephens, PA.

“This looks like an interim step unless they can figure out how to make these two very different businesses – daily deals and full priced menswear – work in the Internet space,” she said.

License to kill
To outsiders, it seemed as if the success was too good to be true, and apparently it was.

In fact, experts believe that this overly-rapid expansion into various industries could be the cause of some of Gilt’s current problems.

“I think the Gilt changes are a simple matter of a company whose eyes were bigger than its stomach,”  Ms. Danziger said.

“They grew too fast [for example launching] the Gilt City daily site and the full-priced men’s site Park & Bond and went outside of their core competencies and core markets into uncharted territory,” she said.

Another reason behind Gilt’s recent problems could be that it has always focused on discounting and not placed enough energy into creating a consumer experience and forming customer relationships.

Given that the main Web site sells mostly luxury items, Gilt should aim to provide luxury-quality service.

“I think that all of the flash-sale sites, unlike Net-A-Porter which has built itself on full price and service, but luxury flash-sale sites have ignored the service experience and have not created a customer culture,” Luxury Institute’s Mr. Pedraza said.

“They are very transactional but they have not created a long-term relationship based on a service component,” he said. “When you don’t do that and you have challenging times it is hard to reach out to consumers.”

In the future, Gilt should look to increase its customer culture and may want to consider a sole full-priced business model such as the one it has for Park & Bond.

Indeed, flash-sale sites often catch on like rapid-fire but the fierce competition and purely transactional relationship with consumers are the ingredients for a short business lifecycle.

“Discounting business models are a race to the bottom because how do you differentiate yourself?” Mr. Pedraza said. “What happens when you can’t discount as much as the next guy? Consumers will abandon you.

“I think Gilt should try to do [only] full-priced business models [like it has for Park & Bond],” he said. “They have the right brand name, but it will take a while for consumers to think of Gilt has a fully-priced provider when they’ve built a business model on discounting.”

http://www.luxurydaily.com/gilt-groupes-woes-may-signify-overall-slump-in-flash-sale-industry/

March 10, 2011

Consumers: We want Gucci or Target. Forget the Gap

By Jessica Dickler
CNNMoney
March 9, 2011

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Consumers are ready for a little luxury. Despite cutting back in other areas, such as dining, they are showing a clear preference for select high-end apparel brands, such as Gucci, Louis Vuitton and Burberry.

After taking a hit at the height of the recession, sales of luxury goods have rebounded strongly, up 10%-12% last year in the U.S., according to estimates by Telsey Advisory Group, a retail equity research firm. Comparatively, retail sales across the board rose just 6%.

“People are willing to pay a premium on something that delivers on luxury,” noted Milton Pedraza, the CEO of the Luxury Institute, which tracks spending among wealthy consumers with a minimum annual income of $150,000. “They will buy fewer but more expensive things. There’s a lot more value consciousness.”

But with an eye on value, shoppers are also hunting down designer brands at steep discounts, frequenting stores such TJ Maxx and online sale sites such as Gilt Groupe.

Ed Jay, senior vice president of American Express Business Insights, calls this “the barbell effect.”

Who’s buying homes? The rich

“They are more high and low in the way that they are spending,” Jay said of today’s consumers. “High-end brands are holding ground among consumers, while spending at value oriented stores has also been pretty stable. It’s a tough place for mid-tier right now,” he said, referring to retailers like the Gap, Chico’s and Ann Taylor.

Susan Towers, who owns her own design business in New York, admits she shops high and low, but nothing in between.

“I shop at Barney’s and Bergdorf’s and take a walk through Loehmann’s every so often,” she said. Lately she says it’s more Loehmann’s and less Barney’s, but still “I’ve never really believed in buying mid-priced stuff.”

She has had to make sacrifices to afford Barney’s, though, because she makes about half of what she used to bring in before the recession. “I had to cut back, eat out less, take less vacations, things like that,” Towers explained.

Part-time French teacher Geraldine Trippitelli also says she would rather have one luxury item, which she pairs with other much less expensive clothing, than more mid-range brands.

“I prefer one Chanel jacket with cheap jeans and T-shirt, but just one, and then I have to be careful for a long time,” said Trippitelli, who shops either in high-end boutiques in New York or discounters like TJ Maxx and Target.

And other shoppers seem to be following suit. Overall luxury fashion spending is up 35% in the past year, while mainstream fashion spending gained just 8% since last year, according to the most recent data by American Express Business Insights, which tracks the spending habits of its 90 million cardholders.

And while high-end department stores like Nordstrom and Saks have rebounded strongly from the recession, more middle-of-the-road shops, such as Macy’s and JC Penney, have struggled to gain ground.

Same-store sales, an important barometer in retail, rose 5.8% at Macy’s and 5% at Kohl’s in February, while Nordstrom jumped 7.3% and Saks was a whopping 15.3% higher. The Gap and Banana Republic both had same-store sales below where they were a year ago.

Part of this trend, explained Robert W. Baird & Co. retail analyst Erika Maschmeyer, is the shift in focus to quality rather than quantity during the recession. “People got used to a different standard of living in the boom area and once you’ve traded up, it’s hard to shift back down,” she said.

Still, as the economy improves and consumer confidence continues to increase, Maschmeyer predicts even those mid-level stores will eventually see stronger sales. “I wouldn’t bet against the American consumer; we like to spend money,” she said.

http://money.cnn.com/2011/03/09/pf/consumers_prefer_luxury/

October 12, 2010

Neiman Marcus embraces Gilt Groupe model with flash sale

By Kaitlyn Bonneville
Luxury Daily
October 12, 2010

Neiman Marcus promoted a midday flash sale held early Friday afternoon via an email campaign sent out to a list of dedicated subscribers.

The sale was held from 11:30 a.m. CT to 1:29 p.m. CT on Neiman Marcus’ Web site. Consumers were offered free shipping with a promotional code that they entered at checkout.

“I think Neiman Marcus is just trying to compete with the Gilt Groupes of the world,” said Milton F. Pedraza, CEO of Luxury Institute, New York. “I think they have the client base to try to do it with.

“I don’t know if they have the chemistry or brand imagery to do it with,” he said. “Neiman, more than Saks or Nordstrom, has suffered during the recession.”

“They are trying to make it exciting and copy the Gilt Groupes and Net-A-Porters and make it more of an exciting experience.”

Neiman Marcus is an Irving, TX-based luxury department store chain.

Neiman Marcus did not respond by press deadline.

Copying the competition

The email blast prompted consumers to click on an image of an hour-glass, bringing them to the flash sale’s landing page.

The sale featured various marked-down merchandise from all departments.

Notable sale items on the Neiman Marcus’ landing page included an Oscar de la Renta coral colored Bow-Waist dress, originally priced at $2,390, on sale for $836, and a Marchesa long black sequin gown, originally priced at $5,940, marked down to $2,079.

The sale was available for the two hours specified or until merchandise sold out. Once the sale was over, the consumer was prompted to shop for Neiman Marcus items at full price.

“I think obviously they are trying to make the sale exciting,” Mr. Pedraza said. “But I don’t know if there is a tremendous strategy behind the timing other than that Friday is a good day for people to start thinking about online shopping.

“The competition and limited offer and limited time is copied from the discount Web sites [such as Gilt Groupe],” he said. “I think that what they are trying to do is test it out and see how it goes.

“I don’t know that the timing is as premeditated as we may think, they may have just put the technology in place and now they want to test it.”

Flash email
Email campaigns and special promotions for consumers are a choice tactic among luxury brands and retailers.

Fashion designer Salvatore Ferragamo recently targeted a list of dedicated subscribers via an email campaign, pushing the new W bag that it launched at Fashion’s Night Out last month (see story).

Likewise, London-based department store Harrods has been pushing sales via targeted emails.

It sent out an email campaign promoting its Christmas hampers last month, offering free shipping when a consumer spent over £100 (see story).

Harrods subsequently encouraged consumers to sign up for its rewards program by offering a limited-time 10 percent discount on most items online and in-store via an email offer last weekend (see story).

In the future, flash sales and email promotions to dedicated shoppers will likely become a staple of luxury brands online, because of their need to make shopping entertaining. Efforts such as Neiman Marcus’ sale on Friday are an attempt at innovation and a way to generate excitement.

“This is eBay-ing it, if you will, and a lot of brands have adopted it online,” Mr. Pedraza said. “Neiman is tapping into it – let’s see it if will last.

“There is a lot of dynamic [marketing] going on and I think it is a wonderful test of something that is going on everywhere else,” he said. “A little late to the party, but its better late than never.

“They are starting to innovate now, retailers are starting to rethink everything and this is just one example of trying to reinvent yourself a bit.”

http://www.luxurydaily.com/neiman-marcus-takes-cues-from-online-discount-retailers-and-hosts-flash-sale/

September 20, 2010

Luxury.com

They were late to the Internet, but brands like Ralph Lauren, Hermès and Tiffany are now making a real splash with their Websites. Some winning features: Live fashion shows, edgy blogs and Q&As with trendsetters. Oh, and nice merchandise. We rank the 10 best sites and window shop at upstarts like ideeli and Gilt.

By Jay Palmer
Barron’s 
Saturday, September 18, 2010

With lean times discouraging conspicuous consumption even among those who can afford it, the posh stores on Los Angeles’ Rodeo Drive, New York’s Madison Avenue, Paris’ Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honore and London’s New Bond Street all have been feeling the pinch.

But there’s one road where luxury sales suddenly are booming: the digital highway. As global sales of high-end goods dropped 20% last year, the category’s online sales jumped by at least 10%, and still are climbing.

It’s not that the well-to-do are only now discovering the Internet. Far from it; wealthy baby boomers were online pioneers. Instead, it’s the makers and sellers of luxury products who are finally getting comfortable with the ‘Net.

“To suggest the Internet had an important role to play in the rarefied world of luxury used to be an act of misplaced bravery, or outright heresy,” says Mark Dunhill, CEO of Faberge. “Today, however, all the major players in this sector are falling over themselves in a rush to embrace the online world.”

In other words they’re not walking on eggshells anymore, not even of the Faberge variety. From Burberry to Louis Vuitton, from Bergdorf Goodman to Tiffany, big-name brands and retailers are setting up inviting, and sometimes dazzling, Websites. At the same time, a whole new generation of online retailers such as Gilt and Ideeli are offering fresh deals every day on a wide array of luxury goods.

“Whether its diamond necklaces, designer cocktail dresses, opulent fur coats or trendy name-brand handbags and shoes, it is now no more than a mouse-click away,” says Milton Pedraza, CEO of New York’s Luxury Institute, a research firm focused on high-net-worth consumers. “Some categories are smaller and some are bigger. But overall, Internet sales account for perhaps 15% of luxury revenue. And as the Websites get better and the industry gains expertise, that could rise to over 40% within five years.”

That’s probably not a stretch.Unlike the early days of the Web, when Amazon.com and its ilk had to attract shoppers to an entirely new way of buying, consumers, especially well-heeled ones, now are now well-schooled in maneuvering online shopping-carts.

“Some of the wealthiest people around are from the leading decade of baby boomers, and these are the people who are the right age to be especially comfortable with computers,” says Susan Lyne, CEO of Gilt Groupe. Her Website offers discounts of as much as 70% on select luxury items in 36-hour sales. To provide a sense of exclusivity, Gilt requires that shoppers become members, which they can do only by invitation — but it offers invitations generously, and there are no fees.

Sites like that are a natural for any upscale consumer who doesn’t like fighting the crowds, and who takes pride in saving a buck.

Says Pedraza: “Wealthy shoppers are usually the best educated, the best connected and the most entrepreneurial. They are tech savvy, ready to appreciate the ease and convenience of buying online.”

The manufacturers and retailers of high-end wares increasingly get the message. Forrester Research says that of the nearly 200 global luxury firms they survey regularly, only a third sold merchandise on the Internet in 2008; today more than two-thirds do so, or are trying to do so.

Just about everyone who launches into Web selling assumes that there are some things that shoppers, rich or poor, wouldn’t be too keen to buy without first smelling, touching or tasting. But in practice, such items are proving few and far between. What sells and what doesn’t sell isn’t always predictable.

Expensive perfumes, exotic foods and snappy clothing are among the categories in which Internet traffic is high. So too are luxury-hotel getaways, rare vintage wines and jewelry fit for a princess.

Then again, some seemingly Web-ready products are proving to be tough sells. Although it’s now easy to sit down at your computer and select options for a BMW or a Benz, few people are driving off digital sales lots; they prefer to kick real tires and meet dealers in the flesh. Nor are luxury timepieces from the likes of Rolex, Breitling and Philippe Patek big sellers on the Web, partly because the watch makers fear antagonizing their traditional distributors.

Many luxury brands initially saw the Web as little more than a sales outlet for excess inventory. But the severity of the recession pushed them to look for new revenue wherever they could, and that meant taking the Internet more seriously. Furthermore, the cost of doing business the classic way has continued to climb, especially for luxury brands looking to build new bricks-and-mortar stores.

“A sophisticated Web store can be created for a few-hundred-thousand dollars now,” says one luxury executive who didn’t want to be identified. “That’s less than the legal fees to review a lease for a new store.” Adds Dunhill of Faberge: “The price of a piece of real estate on any prestigious luxury street or shopping mall around the world has become prohibitive to all but the wealthiest brands. The cost of creating a presence online is less intimidating.”

None of which is to say online luxury sales are a cinch. Most purveyors of luxe are still unsure exactly how to blend their image with the reality that the Internet is a mass-market selling forum. They have been slow off the mark and have a long way to go before their presentations catch up with top ‘Net retailers like Amazon, Expedia and Netflix, whose sites are comprehensive and easy to use. With only a few exceptions, existing luxury Websites tend to be heavier on glitter than on utility, blending music with high-quality photographs of products placed in up-market settings (think Tuscan villas and gardens).

On Prada’s site, for instance, which opens with singer Katey Judd’s sexy rendition of “Fever,” it’s hard to find the e-store amid the other info, including links to fashion catalogs, videos of runway shows and the Fondazione Prada, which publishes books and sponsors art installations.

But the luxury sites are steadily improving. Most have added editorial features, including fashion blogs and videos. Nordstrom, for example, displays photos of customers showing the clothes they chose for work, home life and weddings. Better still, the company broke down its traditional walls, tying its Website into its full inventory. If there is just one handbag available of a particular style, even if it’s on the other side of the country, a shopper would still see it come up as available online, ready to be shipped.

Gucci has managed to create a site that is both stylish and easy to browse. Though you can’t rotate images, you can view them from four different angles and quickly surf through lines of matching accessories. Another well-regarded success story is Louis Vuitton, the maker of leather goods and clothes. Unlike many of its peers, it offers nearly all its products on the Web.

The biggest innovation in online luxury retailing is the development of start-ups such as Gilt, Ideeli, HauteLook, Swirl and scores more. They sell designer clothing and shoes, electronic gadgets, home furniture and furnishings, tableware and luxury vacations, including accommodations at resorts and plush city-center hotels. The prices are often fantastic and on one, Rent The Runway, you not only can buy clothing but rent it for short periods.

These start-ups have been attracting big-money investors and may eventually go public. Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a venture-capital firm that backed Google and Amazon, has put money into One Kings Lane, a site selling home decor. Gilt Groupe got its start with $55 million from Matrix Partners.

“Luxury online is open to a potentially bigger audience than luxury brick-and-mortar stores,” says Paul Hurley, CEO of Ideeli. “You can reach everyone everywhere who has a computer, including those who are maybe not especially rich, but in this particular case want to buy luxury. Everything is super-convenient, and this is an entirely new retail channel that is in my view ideal for luxury goods.”

The new sites are offering far more than clothing. Last week, Gilt Groupe’s Jetsetter subsidiary was selling a South African tour ($5,800), a plush Jamaican resort ($180 a night) and the Berlin Grand Hyatt ($180 a night). The only real drawback: Nearly all sales are nonrefundable.

The major brands and retailers are making some clear progress on their own Websites. Just look at the 10 in our ranking on this page. As the sites work to perfect their presentations — from the background music to the blogs about luxe living and tools for zooming in on merchandise — they are sure to attract and keep more shoppers. With a little more competition from the likes of Gilt and Ideeli, they may even start trimming their prices.

In the discriminating world of luxury, the Internet might yet become the most luxurious place to shop.

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052970204914704575489824199921124.html

July 12, 2010

A shift in meaning for ‘luxury’ as shopping habits change

By Bruce Horovitz, USA TODAY

Steve Hundley dumped his Jaguar convertible. He stopped taking Baltic cruises. And he stopped buying his wife pricey jewelry.
But last year, just as the recession raised its head, the San Diego resident paid $6,500 for an outdoor artisan pizza oven.

“We don’t need the Jaguar or cruises to the Baltic,” says Hundley, who at 56, is semiretired following a heart attack two years ago. “But cooking healthy food is a big priority.”

Americans are dipping their toes back into the luxury pool — but with a mindset that’s been smacked down and radically reshaped by the recession, the lure of new technologies and emerging lifestyle twists that are often as much personal as cultural.

“The luxury brands are all trying to reinvent themselves and deliver a better experience,” says Milton Pedraza, CEO of the Luxury Institute, a research firm that consults for designer brands. “Apple is making all these companies rethink their business models.”

It wasn’t long ago that luxury primarily meant the accumulation of designer clothes, expensive jewelry and fancy cars. For some, it still does. But for many consumers, the new luxury is something seriously different.

For some, it’s about owning top technology-based products. Consider: The four brands most admired by Americans with six-digit incomes in a recent survey by the marketing specialist Affluence Collaborative were Apple, Microsoft, Best Buy and Sony.

For others, such as the Hundleys, the new luxury is about investing in a lifestyle experience that not only can help improve health but also escalate the experience of such mundane acts as baking a pizza at home. Sales of outdoor artisan pizza ovens at Kalamazoo Outdoor Gourmet — similar to ovens used at pizza parlors — were up 48% last year and are up 74% so far this year.

“It creates an experience — and isn’t consumable,” says Pantelis “Pete” Georgiadis, president of Kalamazoo. “You can keep enjoying it for a long, long time.”

For others, it’s about buying luxury goods only when they’re on sale — or at a steep discount. Nearly three in four wealthy women say they’ll only purchase luxuries if they can get a good deal, reports a recent survey by AgencySacks, a branding firm that consults for some of the nation’s top luxury brands.

Luxury spending slid 7.8% last year to $10.1 billion, says Spending Pulse, a consumer spending monitor from MasterCard. It’s bounced back up for the first five months of 2010. But even affluent customers continue to seek out discounts, bargains and sales, says Tim Murphy, chief product officer at MasterCard. In a recent MasterCard poll, some 64% of all consumers said they were shopping sales. “A few years ago, you’d just market access to the affluent. Now, you must market access — with a discount.”

All this was driven by the recession. “The recession made everyone stop and rethink luxury and value,” says Pedraza. “Even though we’re coming back, that realization has stuck.”

The new world of luxury is less about designer labels and glitz and more about shopping savvy and an I-feel-good-owning-this mentality. Marketers want to know: Will it last?

Pedraza certainly thinks so. He says that Apple and Sony are emerging as the newest luxury designer labels.

“With Apple, you get a better design, a better function and a better luxury experience than you do with most other luxury brands,” he says.

Pedraza recently asked the CEO of a giant European luxury apparel brand to name the company that he viewed as his toughest competitor. Without batting an eye, the CEO, whose company Pedraza won’t name due to client confidentiality, said it was Apple.

Apple declined to comment.

Not a need, but a want

But Yolanda Cummings, who works as a finance professional in Columbus, Ohio, says that to her, there are few things closer to luxury than owning her new Apple iPad. “I don’t need it. I just wanted it because it’s new, different and intriguing,” she says. She paid about $699 for it. She already has a $300 Apple iPod touch and $1,600 Apple MacBook.

“I used to go overboard buying clothes,” she says. “Now, I’m more inclined to purchase new technologies.”

Andrew Sacks, who is president of AgencySacks, says he bought an iPad the first week it was introduced.

“Part of it is escapist luxury,” he says. “We’re living in a world where it’s difficult to control a lot of things, so there’s a feeling that owning new technology allows me to be more organized, more efficient and have more time.”

The recession, he says, has helped to rejigger his own definition of luxury.

Recently, Sacks says, he reached into his closet and discovered a black leather John Varvatos jacket that he’d casually purchased several years ago for $1,500 at a New York boutique. He put the jacket in his closet — and forgot it about it.

But when he recently rediscovered it — post-recession — his view of the jacket had changed entirely. “I was a little embarrassed that I could take something so expensive and put it away and not even have it on my mind,” he says. “Today, I’d do a lot more research before even considering such a purchase.”

For Don Contreras, luxury is the flat-screen Sony TV that he plans to buy and install in the gazebo in his backyard.

On weekends, the federal government physician from Albuquerque likes to do yard work and prune the fruit trees he has in his backyard. But he also likes to watch sports on TV. By placing the Sony TV in his gazebo, he says, he’ll be able to do both.

He only wants a Sony, he says, because that’s the only electronics brand that he trusts. But he’s waiting to buy it until he finds a really good deal.

“I’m not an impulsive buyer,” he says. “I can wait.”

Executives at Sony have concocted a new term for the brand: “functional” luxury.

In a tough economy, says Stuart Redsun, marketing chief at Sony Electronics, “You don’t have to worry about your product breaking down quickly.”

Beyond that, he says, the functional luxury is from the product providing a new experience — such as the new Sony Cyber-shot camera that lets folks shoot panoramic photos or new 3D TV sets that let folks experience home viewing of movies in a new way.

Another example: Sony soon will be the first consumer electronics maker with a Google feature built into its TV sets. Folks watching any show will be able to use a special remote to search Google on the same TV screen.

Sony also has pushed the value message hard. Over the holidays, for example, it bundled a new Sony TV, PlayStation gaming system, game and Blu-ray movie for $900 less than it would cost to buy the items separately.

“We sold out of all the units in that promotion,” notes Redsun. It recently rolled out a similar bundled deal that ends July 17.

Value and luxury have become synonymous.

At Neiman Marcus, “our customers’ way of shopping has changed,” says Karen Katz, CEO of Neiman Marcus Stores. “She is responding well to the opening and middle price points.”

For example, many Manolo Blahnik designer shoes at Neiman Marcus typically sell for at least $500 — and some for upwards of $900. But in the spring, Neiman Marcus had great success selling a Manolo Blahnik ballet flat for $395. “Our customer was very happy to have a Blahnik shoe for under $500,” says Katz.

Bargain in the bag

It’s no accident that Coach, whose handbags used to start at about $250 — and whose average retail price for a handbag hit close to $350 before the recession — launched a new line last year, Poppy, which starts at $198.

Beyond that, Coach has added more bags at lower price points — and made them more function for women carrying devices from iPhones to iPads, says Michael Tucci, president of Coach’s North American retail division. “The last thing I want you to get from this is that Coach got cheaper. We got more compelling from a value standpoint.”

Consumers have responded. Coach sales are up 8% for first nine months of its fiscal 2010

Value, of course, is in the eye of the purchaser.

To Lori Wachs, a hedge fund partner from Philadelphia, nothing says luxury value like getting top-notch designer clothing at 40% to 70% off — simply by visiting a website.

Several times a week, she visits the luxury discount site Gilt.com, where shoppers have a restricted amount of time — sometimes a matter of hours or even minutes — to order luxury goods before someone else beats them to the limited number of items.

While Wachs won’t say exactly what she’s spent in the past 18 months, she says she’s spent “thousands” of dollars on the 100 or so items she’s purchased. Among them, a Chloé handbag, originally priced at $1,500, that she snatched for about $600.

“There’s an adrenaline rush when there is a certain brand that you love,” she says, “and after you click on it, you wait to see if it’s been added to your basket — or to someone else’s cart.”

In two years, Gilt Groupe has amassed more than two million members, says CEO Susan Lyne.

“A lot of people feel like chumps if they pay full price,” says Lyne. “When you get a deal on a luxury item, it makes you feel smart.”

http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/retail/2010-07-11-luxury-buying_N.htm