Luxury Institute News

May 16, 2013

U.S. 2 Percenters Trade Down With Post-Recession Angst

By Cotten Timberlake
Bloomberg
May 15, 2013

Jennifer Prentice, a medical-equipment saleswoman in Minneapolis, once had no qualms about dropping $600 or more for Gucci purses. Now she spends $300 for Coach Inc. bags and is filling in her Burberry wardrobe with pieces from j.-crew.

“The things we went through over the last couple of years definitely have an impact on what I am doing,” Prentice, 45, said in an interview. “I tend to be less frivolous now.”

While good times keep rolling for the super-wealthy, many Americans at the bottom end of the privileged group with incomes of $250,000 or more are thinking twice. These “two-percenters,” unnerved by the most recent recession, are trading down to less-expensive offerings from Coach Inc. and Ralph Lauren Corp. (RL) rather than pricier goods from Prada SpA (1913) and Giorgio Armani SpA. Even with the stock and real estate markets rebounding, they’re not draining their wealth again, and the shift may prove challenging for the highest-priced brands that can no longer lean on credit card-fueled aspirational customers.

“The rich have lost their exuberance,” said Pam Danziger, president of Unity Marketing, a luxury research firm. “They do not feel as wealthy. They increasingly feel that their wealth is threatened, real or not.”

An increasing share of America’s “ultra-affluent” consumers view themselves as middle-class and are spending like “Henrys,” which stands for High Earner Not Rich Yet, Danziger said. People in the latter category earn $100,000 to $249,999 a year, putting them in the top 20 percent by income, Danziger said.

Spending Falls

Ultra-affluents’ spending on personal and household luxuries as well as experiences such as travel but excluding autos, fell 19 percent last year to $96,568, the lowest in five years, Unity Marketing says. Spending on personal luxuries slid 26 percent, the biggest drop of any of the categories, to $32,283. The ultra-affluents’ spending peaked at $167,919 in 2010, driven by pent-up demand after the recession. Henrys’ spending retreated 8 percent to $34,958 last year.

Luxury spending in the Americas grew 5 percent on a constant-currency basis in 2012, slower than the 13 percent gain the previous year, Bain & Co. estimates. The Americas accounted for 31 percent of the 212 billion-euro ($274 billion) market, the consulting firm says.

Apparel and accessories brands on the way down with affluent consumers include Prada, Armani, PPR (PP) SA’s Gucci, Dolce & Gabbana Srl, Hermes International (RMS) SCA and Gianni Versace SpA, Danziger said.

Names on the way up are Coach, Ralph Lauren, Michael Kors Holdings (KORS) Ltd., Gap Inc.’s Banana Republic, J. Crew Group Inc. and Urban Outfitters Inc. (URBN)’s Anthropologie, she said.

The turning tide is discernible in companies’ recent sales.

Slowing Growth

Gucci-owner PPR’s comparable luxury sales growth slowed to 8 percent in North America in the first quarter from 20 percent a year earlier. LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA (MC)’s growth excluding acquisitions and foreign-currency fluctuations shrank to 7 percent in the U.S. excluding Hawaii in the first quarter from 16 percent a year earlier. In contrast, Michael Kors in its most recent quarter posted a 41 percent comparable-store sales increase in North America, faster than the 38 percent gain a year earlier.

“The premium brands have really upped their game, competing more fiercely with the luxury brands,” said Danziger, whose consulting firm is based in Stevens, Pennsylvania.

Michael Kors shares jumped 20 percent this year through yesterday and Coach advanced 6.5 percent. LVMH dropped 2.2 percent. PPR is up 23 percent, benefiting from divestitures of non-luxury retail units. Kors rose 1.4 percent to $62.18 at 9:35 a.m. in New York while Coach climbed 0.5 percent to $59.40. LVMH added 0.3 percent to 136.20 euros and PPR slid 1.9 percent to 170.10 euros in Paris.

Strategic Buying

Affluent shoppers are being strategic, buying a few particular items from the luxury brands that give them the most pleasure and making trade-offs on the rest, Danziger said.

While mixing high- and low-priced fashions has been a trend for years, “it’s even more pronounced now,” said Milton Pedraza, chief executive officer of the Luxury Institute, a research firm in New York. Consumers are buying “high-quality yet low-cost products” so they can “splurge on the superb luxury product.

‘‘They are discerning to a fault these days,’’ he said.

Among these consumers is Jose Bandujo, the owner of an eponymous New York advertising agency, who estimates his spending on personal luxuries has declined as much as 20 percent because he’s investing in a home renovation.

‘‘I have to have a practical need,’’ said Bandujo, 49. ‘‘There are things still in my closet with labels that I never wore, and I find that appalling now.’’

Real Estate

The rich are channeling some of the money they’re saving into homes amid the perceived recovery of the housing markets, said Hana Ben-Shabat, a New York-based partner in the retail practice of the A.T. Kearney Inc. consulting firm.

‘‘Many affluent people are converting their money into real estate and things that have long-term investment returns and are spending less on having the latest Hermes handbag,’’ she said. ‘‘When they do have to buy a handbag, they go buy Coach.’’

She has one caveat: A small cadre of ultra high-net worth individuals, with $5 million and more in net assets, is insulated and not cutting back, she said.

Luxury consumers are shopping more for durability and quality rather than just the name on the label, said Jerome Jacques, a Malibu, California-based handbag designer.

‘‘A lot of people are tired of the vanity,’’ Jacques said. ‘‘They don’t want something that is bling-bling and gaudy. They want something really well-made, that doesn’t shine, and that has value.”

Functional Classics

Before the recession, Jacques produced seasonal collections of 20 designs that he distributed wholesale to now heavily saturated retailers like Macy’s Inc. (M)’s Bloomingdale’s. These days, he’s engineering a perpetual collection of 10 classic and functional bags under a new line called “Article Indefini” that he wants to sell directly to consumers. A luxury handbag should cost $400 to $800, he said. A $7,000 Hermes bag is “ridiculous,” he said.

Lori Hirsch, an attorney from Basking Ridge, New Jersey, in her 40s, said she is among consumers buying fewer goods — in her case one or two outfits a season versus five or six before the recession — partly by stretching out her purchases.

“The economy is not as bounced-back as people make it out to be,” Hirsch said. “I continue to make purchases on an as-needed basis without being extravagant.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-15/u-s-2-percenters-trade-down-with-post-recession-angst.html

April 24, 2012

Wealthy U.S. Consumers Favor and Feel More Connected to Luxury Brands Offering a Mobile App

(NEW YORK) April 24, 2012 – The independent and objective New York City-based Luxury Institute, in cooperation with award-winning mobile marketing agency Plastic Mobile, surveyed affluent U.S. consumers about the growing connection between luxury and the emerging mobile market. The results of their research have just been released in the study, “Mobile Apps And Commerce for Luxury Brands.”

“Luxury brands must acknowledge the impact of technology advancements in the mobile space and find a humanistic way to connect and engage with their consumers through mobile,” says Milton Pedraza, CEO of Luxury Institute.

Gucci, Louis Vuitton, Saks Fifth Avenue, and Gilt Groupe are the most frequently downloaded apps by wealthy consumers who have luxury brand applications on their mobile device. Most affluent smartphone owners who are downloading luxury apps are using them to find information on products, services or brands (56%).

Almost all wealthy consumers who have used luxury brand apps report that they have had a good experience with the mobile apps (93%). In addition, 71% report that they feel better connected to luxury brands after downloading and/or using their applications and 64% view luxury brands that offer a mobile application more favorably than brands that do not.

The survey respondents indicate there are a number of features they expect from luxury brand applications and highlight loyalty programs (46%) and early access to sales (45%) as the most important.  In addition, providing sales professionals with a mobile application that can specify details about products (53%), have the ability to check for sizes and availability at other stores (50%) and in-store product inventory (47%) would enrich the luxury shopping experience for affluent consumers.

Of the 63% of wealthy consumers who have made a purchase through their mobile device, just under 20% have bought a luxury product or service. While preference for the in-store experience (45%) is why wealthy smartphone users have not yet fully embraced luxury mobile commerce, the majority of luxury consumers who choose to shop via mobile report that there is no upper monetary limit to how much they would spend (72%). This indicates a tremendous emerging opportunity for luxury brands to connect with consumers through mobile.

“Mobile has been receiving a lot attention in the retail space lately. The study suggests the mobile strategy for luxury brands must be about enhancing the in-store customer experience and using the platform to help strengthen customer relationships,” says Melody Adhami, President and COO of Plastic Mobile.

About Luxury Institute (www.LuxuryInstitute.com)
The Luxury Institute is the objective and independent global voice of the high net-worth consumer. The Institute conducts extensive and actionable research with wealthy consumers about their behaviors and attitudes on customer experience best practices. In addition, we work closely with top-tier luxury brands to successfully transform their organizational cultures into more profitable customer-centric enterprises. Our Luxury CRM Culture consulting process leverages our fact-based research and enables luxury brands to dramatically Outbehave as well as Outperform their competition. The Luxury Institute also operates LuxuryBoard.com, a membership-based online research portal, and the Luxury CRM Association, a membership organization dedicated to building customer-centric luxury enterprises.

About Plastic Mobile
Plastic Mobile is an award-winning mobile marketing agency of thinkers, artists, creators and builders with one common aspiration: to create extraordinary user experiences. Plastic Mobile is at the heart of the evolution of interactive mobile technology, pushing the boundaries and setting the bar for the standard of quality.

Known for many quality, first-in-kind mobile initiatives, Plastic Mobile delivers exceptional client service and highly customized mobile solutions for all platforms. With a diverse, high-profile client list, including Air Miles, Axe and Royal Le Page, they are the proud recipients of myriad awards, including the 15th annual Webby shopping award, “the Oscars of the Internet.” www.plasticmobile.com

February 21, 2012

Mystery Shoppers on Luxury Brands In-Store vs. Online

By Accessories Staff
February 20, 2012
Accessories

New York—Burberry earned top marks for its in-store and online experiences among luxury brands in a recent mystery shopper study, according to the WealthSurvey from the Luxury Institute.

Conducted by Professor Veronica Marlow of Brooklyn College, the mystery shoppers survey recruited a panel of 167 fashion marketing and merchandising students who paid some 263 visits to Manhattan store locations of Burberry, Chanel, Gucci, Louis Vuitton and Prada. The mystery shoppers also logged another 257 visits to the same brands’ websites to evaluate design, navigation and whether they would likely prompt a purchase or recommendation to friends or family.

“In its store, Burberry succeeds at creating a friendly atmosphere, with 85% of mystery shoppers saying they felt comfortable wandering around and browsing the merchandise,” the Luxury Institute reported. “Only Gucci came close to duplicating Burberry’s success in creating a comfortable atmosphere with 67% of shoppers saying they felt at ease inside of Gucci.”

Burberry scored top marks online, too, with 77% of visitors impressed by its visual appeal and 75% citing the superior design and ease of navigation.” Louis Vuitton also ranked high on site design with 75% of visitors favorably impressed. Burberry’s website also excelled for ease of completing purchases at 85%.

Interestingly, in its 2011 Global Brand report, Intrabrand last fall specifically cited Burberry as a top riser among luxury brands. “Burberry bested them all by focusing on its core competencies in fashion, digital innovation and global expansion,” Intrabrands reported.

As to whether they’d make a purchase online in the future, Burberry tied with Gucci as 42% of visitors said they would return to make a purchase. Whereas Chanel.com (22%) and Prada.com (24%) garnered the lowest among those who were willing to recommend the site to others.

Among the mystery shoppers others findings:

•Sales associates’ behavior and demeanor had a major effect on how “polite” a brand was viewed. About 96% said Burberry’s in-store staff was “pleasant” while only 60% said the same of Prada. Burberry and Chanel both received more than 90% on having staffs that were articulate and educated.

•Sales associates were more likely to offer assistance to shoppers at Burberry (75%) while Prada staff offered help only 55% of the time. “When you asked them a question, they quickly responded with little detail and walked away quickly,” observed one mystery shopper about Prada’s associates.

•Overall sales associates at Burberry (92%) and Louis Vuitton (91%) were seen as polite and courteous. Only 69% said the same of Prada’s staff.

•Prada, however, scored the highest on its store design with 91% applauding the aesthetics. Next was Burberry at 82% and Gucci at 75%.

“Ultimately shoppers are just as likely (42%) to make a purchase at Prada as they are to shop at Burberry in the future; 50% plan to return to Chanel. Chanel also earns the highest score (58%) for deserving a recommendation to friends or family.”

For additional information about this study and others, see www.LuxuryBoard.com

http://www.accessoriesmagazine.com/36740/mystery-shoppers-on-luxury-brands-in-store-vs-online

 

December 22, 2011

Q&A, Milton Pedraza, CEO of the Luxury Institute

By Patty Orsini
JWT Intelligence
December 21, 2011

As CEO of the Luxury Institute, Milton Pedraza has seen the pendulum swing from the exuberance of the mid-2000s to the stalled spending of the recession to the more exclusive market we are seeing now, four years after the downturn started. But while the luxury market has quickly evolved, luxury itself is timeless, he says. Pedraza spoke to us about just what has changed in the category on the part of brands and their customers since the pre-recession period and how a taste of luxury helps purchasers “Live a Little,” one of our 10 trends for 2012.

How do you define luxury?

Luxury is defined by wealthy consumers as the best in design, quality, craftsmanship and service, all combined into an extraordinary experience that is truly relevant, both functionally and emotionally.

Why do people make luxury purchases? What is it that gives people satisfaction?

There has always been a quest to own the best. Having the best gives you tremendous satisfaction, and it certainly provides status, which all humans seek at some level. Beyond that, there is a requirement that the product provide investment value. Consumers are taking their hard-earned money and putting it into something that must deliver lasting value. The design should be timeless, and the quality and the craftsmanship must last a long time. And if there is ever a problem a problem with the product, there is an impeccable level of service.

The idea of investment could appeal even to the most frugal minded then, right?

Yes, there is the investment value of having something that lasts. You may buy a wonderful handbag or a pair of shoes, and you are willing to invest significant sums because you know that it’s going to last you a long time. Consumers are very discerning, so they’re taking a hard look at the quality, the craftsmanship and the functionality to determine investment value. There is a quest for optimization on the part of luxury consumers these days that wasn’t there in 2007. Back then consumers were less discerning, and brands also were willing to offer less value.

So it seems like luxury consumers aren’t feeling guilty about spending these days?

Not the majority, who feel they earn their money without doing damage to society. Most luxury consumers tell us that status is secondary with a luxury purchase. Often it is a reward: They’ve earned it, so they can treat themselves to something special. For the most part the guilt is gone. And there is also less of “I’m going to borrow to get it, even though I haven’t earned it.” I think that is a healthier approach and one that people understand. I don’t see too many people today buying in excess or buying out of their affordability range.

Are brands doing anything differently in their marketing now, compared to 2005 to 2007?

Today advertising is still important, but it’s about building long-term relationships. It’s about retaining customers.

Consumers are still a little on edge, though, never quite sure about their net worth from day to day.

If Europe gets worse, you’re going to see some moderation in luxury spending, because consumers are concerned about the global economic risks. If the stock market declines significantly, there will be a more temperate approach to buying luxury. Still, we all love our luxuries. Even the aspirational consumers, the young professionals who don’t have a lot of assets but have a reasonably good income, are saying, “OK, I might spend a little more, but I will buy a few luxury items that have true lasting value.”

So it’s more about the occasional splurge?

For the aspirationals, it is occasional; it’s rational. Many luxury consumers today say, “I want to have a few special things in my life. So let me buy that Gucci bag, that Vuitton bag, that Chanel bag. I’m not going to buy as many as I used to, but I am going to buy, because luxury has lasting value.”

Do you see luxury popping up in more categories, in more places?

Yes. For example, in concerts and events I invariably see a lot of VIP offerings. You see it in concierge medicine. I think particularly in services, you’re going to see a greater segmentation. In airlines, you can now pay for preferred seating, or early boarding, to get in the front of the line. Service companies are using these services to make some people happy but also to improve their profitability.

How are brands retooling for today’s consumer spending patterns?

Many luxury brands offered a lot of “affordable luxury” back in 2007. Today they have pruned their offerings and are discounting less. Both luxury brands and retailers such as Saks and Nordstrom realized that a lot of those cheaper products were eroding brand equity. Today there is far more rational production and selling of true luxury, as opposed to the pretend luxury we saw during the bubble.

A lot of brands went back to the standard of true luxury, and the effort paid off with both wealthy and affluent consumers. Consumers are willing to pay full price for true luxury.

Going into 2012, do you see the definition of luxury evolving?

What you’ll see is that many companies will go back to delivering the high standards of luxury, as opposed to just pretending to be luxury. Luxury has been very consistent. It’s had its ups and downs, but the definition of luxury remains the same. A true luxury brand delivers the highest level of design, quality, craftsmanship and service, with a long, long history of delivering true value.

http://www.jwtintelligence.com/2011/12/qa-milton-pedraza-ceo-luxury-institute/

November 30, 2011

Men, Not Women, Drive Luxury Goods Sales in China

By Neerja Pawha Jetley
CNBC
November 29, 2011

Contrary to popular perception, men — not women — make up the bulk of consumers buying luxury goods in China. From Giorgio Armani clothes to Gucci handbags and Rolex watches, Chinese men have been outstripping women when it comes to shopping.

In 2010, Chinese men spent 7 billion yuan ($1.1 billion) on their wardrobes, far more than the 2.8 billion yuan spent by women, according to a Bain report. Further, the market for luxury menswear in China is expected to rise 9 percent in 2011 compared to 7 percent for women’s wear, according to the consulting firm.

Looking to tap this spending power of Chinese men is Landmark Men – a 60,000 square-foot men’s-only mall in Hong Kong. Luxury brands like Valentino Men, Gucci and Louis Vuitton are nestled amongst premium grooming products, fragrances and gadgets in this sprawling mall that opened in October 2011.

Victor Luis, president of Coach Retail International in Shanghai was quoted by the Los Angeles Times as saying men make up 45 percent of the $1.2 billion market for all luxury handbags in China. In the U.S., that figure is just 7 percent. He added that “There’s a confidence and comfort in Chinese men utilizing bags in the same manner as women do.”

Vinay Dixit, Senior Expert and Leader of McKinsey Asia Consumer Center, told CNBC that over the past 12 months, Chinese men on average spent 61 percent more than women on fragrances and 52 per cent more on watches.

Seeing this growing affinity among Chinese men to shop, luxury brands are going all out to woo them. Dior Homme, for example, has around 35 freestanding men’s stores in China.

Burberry, the maker of the iconic check trench coat, has opened 59 stores in 31 Chinese cities with every store carrying a wider selection of men’s styles compared to other markets.

Louis Vuitton now has 36 stores in 29 cities across the mainland, compared to stores in just 10 cities in 2005. The company has used an Asian male model for the first time in its 2011 advertising campaign, a likely attempt to woo the male shopper in China.

Other retailers are also expanding rapidly. Gucci, which started with just six stores at the beginning of 2006, has 39 stores today. Hermes quadrupled its stores from five in 2005 to 20 today. All these stores house the company’s full range, including menswear. “There’s a reason for the rush: while many other markets are flat or shrinking, luxury goods are booming in China,” according to a 2011 McKinsey Insights China research report.

The report points out that China will account for over 20 percent of global luxury sales by 2015 and will overtake Japan as the world’s largest market for luxury goods. Market watchers say Chinese male consumers will drive much of this growth.

The average male luxury shopper in China is less than 45 years old, educated, well-traveled and entrepreneurial, says McKinsey‘s Dixit.

According to a senior manager at a prominent luxury brand in Hong Kong, until a few years back, luxury consumption in China was a result of businessmen traveling abroad and bringing home fine goods. “Men were bigger shoppers than women, buying gifts for wives and business associates, very often for government officials,” he said.

But the motivations have now changed. Men are now rewarding themselves for hard work and success. “They also consider luxury labels as lending credence to not just their social status, but individual style,” said the McKinsey report.

L’Oreal, the French personal care products company, now sells more male grooming products in China than in Western Europe, according to media reports.

Sales in China in 2010 rose to 9.085 billion yuan ($1.38 billion), an 11.1 percent increase over the previous year, and a double-digit gain for the 10th consecutive year, said Alexis Perakis-Valat, CEO of L’Oreal China at a news conference in Beijing earlier this year.

According to a recent seven-country survey conducted by the New-York based Luxury Institute, attitudes toward shopping for luxury goods were far more positive in China than in rich nations. Seventy-five percent of Chinese said that luxury expenditures were “prudent” purchases, while 78 percent of wealthy consumers in the U.S., U.K., and Germany considered them to be an “extravagance.”

http://www.cnbc.com/id/45472638

November 10, 2011

PPR’s play for Brioni signals new interest in menswear: Pinault

By Rachel Lamb
Luxury Daily
November 9, 2011

With its planned acquisition of Italian label Brioni, Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent owner PPR has made clear its interest in a market segment where it sees much potential: luxury menswear.

Founed in 1942, Brioni is known for both season collections and bespoke products targeting men looking to addstyle and pizazz to their wardrobe. Financial details of the planned transaction were not disclosed yesterday.

“Brioni’s acquisition makes a lot of sense for PPR,” said François-Henri Pinault, chairman/CEO of PPR. “The brand is complementary and does not compete with the group’s other brands, as much as in regards with its market positioning than on its stylistic content.

“Growth in the men’s segment is significantly stronger than in women’s, and Brioni is the perfect match for this,” he said.

PPR owns Gucci, Bottega Veneta, Yves Saint Laurent, Alexander McQueen, Balenciaga, Boucheron, Girard-Perregaux, JeanRichard, Sergio Rossi and Stella McCartney.

Spoken for
PPR announced the signing of an agreement with Brioni shareholders to acquire all of its capital yesterday morning.

The transaction should be finalized at the beginning of 2012, according to PPR.

Brioni has significant intrinsic growth potential and PPR will enable it to accelerate its expansion and boost its profitability, notably through a wider product range and geographic expansion in strong growth markets, according to the conglomerate.

“PPR is buying one of the most prestigious and exclusive brands in the mens clothing business – Brioni is a gem of a brand,” said Milton Pedraza, CEO of the Luxury Institute, New York. “As PPR has shown with Bottega Veneta and Gucci, it knows how to scale a brand.

“Most of these brands are for men’s and women’s clothing, but Brioni is very distinctive and will give PPR an edge for custom and bespoke men’s clothing,” he said. “They can even expand the brand into accessories because men’s is such a growing business.

“PPR has the power to bring Brioni to a $1 billion company.”

Indeed, many experts believe that Brioni will certainly flourish under the control of PPR.

The addition of Brioni is a quick expansion of PPR’s product line and adds a new customer base for other PPR brands, according to Ron Kurtz, president of the American Affluence Research Center, Atlanta.

Brioni can benefit from having access to the capital resources of PPR and PPR’s relationships with the channels of distribution, he said.

Luxury brands that are part of conglomerates are provided with extra protection, especially in light of economic uncertainty.

PPR has taken brands such as Bottega Veneta and Gucci under its wings, turning them into extremely lucrative and successful labels.

“I think that Bottega Veneta is one of the most successful luxury brands in the last 10 years,” Luxury Institute’s Mr. Pedraza said. “The marketing and the customer experience expertise of PPR will be a tremendous asset to building Brioni.”

Acquiring gems
The luxury industry has witnessed several mergers and acquisitions in the past year.

Some experts believe that the reemergence of M&A is indicative of a recovery economy.

Following the recent acquisition of sportswear manufacturer Volcom, PPR announced in July its 50.1-percent stake majority control of Swiss watchmaker Sowind Group, parent company of Girard-Perregaux and JeanRichard.

This is just the most recent in a whirlwind of mergers and acquisitions in the luxury industry.

For example, footwear manufacturer Jones Group acquired Kurt Geiger in June, which followed the sale of Jimmy Choo to Labelux in May.

Additionally, Richemont, the conglomerate that owns luxury brands such as Jaeger-LeCoultre, Cartier and Montblanc, recently acquired online retailer Net-A-Porter this summer.

Furthermore, the ever-hungry LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton set its sights on, and soon acquired, Italian jeweler Bulgari in the first quarter of this year.

This begs the question: Is there any hope for independently-owned luxury brands in the future, or will they all eventually be owned by conglomerates?

“I think that luxury brands can achieve a certain level on their own – look at Coach,” Luxury Institute’s Mr. Pedraza said. “Gaining capital is the easiest thing to do right now, but having great financial management is a skill that these companies [such as PPR] have.

“There is no question that luxury brands can remain independent, but a brand in a conglomerate that has this certain level of expertise will grow tremendously,” he said. “The portfolio management approach works well for both the conglomerates that acquire brands and the brands that are acquired.”

http://www.luxurydaily.com/ppr-has-the-power-to-bring-brioni-to-a-1b-company-expert/

March 10, 2011

Consumers: We want Gucci or Target. Forget the Gap

By Jessica Dickler
CNNMoney
March 9, 2011

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Consumers are ready for a little luxury. Despite cutting back in other areas, such as dining, they are showing a clear preference for select high-end apparel brands, such as Gucci, Louis Vuitton and Burberry.

After taking a hit at the height of the recession, sales of luxury goods have rebounded strongly, up 10%-12% last year in the U.S., according to estimates by Telsey Advisory Group, a retail equity research firm. Comparatively, retail sales across the board rose just 6%.

“People are willing to pay a premium on something that delivers on luxury,” noted Milton Pedraza, the CEO of the Luxury Institute, which tracks spending among wealthy consumers with a minimum annual income of $150,000. “They will buy fewer but more expensive things. There’s a lot more value consciousness.”

But with an eye on value, shoppers are also hunting down designer brands at steep discounts, frequenting stores such TJ Maxx and online sale sites such as Gilt Groupe.

Ed Jay, senior vice president of American Express Business Insights, calls this “the barbell effect.”

Who’s buying homes? The rich

“They are more high and low in the way that they are spending,” Jay said of today’s consumers. “High-end brands are holding ground among consumers, while spending at value oriented stores has also been pretty stable. It’s a tough place for mid-tier right now,” he said, referring to retailers like the Gap, Chico’s and Ann Taylor.

Susan Towers, who owns her own design business in New York, admits she shops high and low, but nothing in between.

“I shop at Barney’s and Bergdorf’s and take a walk through Loehmann’s every so often,” she said. Lately she says it’s more Loehmann’s and less Barney’s, but still “I’ve never really believed in buying mid-priced stuff.”

She has had to make sacrifices to afford Barney’s, though, because she makes about half of what she used to bring in before the recession. “I had to cut back, eat out less, take less vacations, things like that,” Towers explained.

Part-time French teacher Geraldine Trippitelli also says she would rather have one luxury item, which she pairs with other much less expensive clothing, than more mid-range brands.

“I prefer one Chanel jacket with cheap jeans and T-shirt, but just one, and then I have to be careful for a long time,” said Trippitelli, who shops either in high-end boutiques in New York or discounters like TJ Maxx and Target.

And other shoppers seem to be following suit. Overall luxury fashion spending is up 35% in the past year, while mainstream fashion spending gained just 8% since last year, according to the most recent data by American Express Business Insights, which tracks the spending habits of its 90 million cardholders.

And while high-end department stores like Nordstrom and Saks have rebounded strongly from the recession, more middle-of-the-road shops, such as Macy’s and JC Penney, have struggled to gain ground.

Same-store sales, an important barometer in retail, rose 5.8% at Macy’s and 5% at Kohl’s in February, while Nordstrom jumped 7.3% and Saks was a whopping 15.3% higher. The Gap and Banana Republic both had same-store sales below where they were a year ago.

Part of this trend, explained Robert W. Baird & Co. retail analyst Erika Maschmeyer, is the shift in focus to quality rather than quantity during the recession. “People got used to a different standard of living in the boom area and once you’ve traded up, it’s hard to shift back down,” she said.

Still, as the economy improves and consumer confidence continues to increase, Maschmeyer predicts even those mid-level stores will eventually see stronger sales. “I wouldn’t bet against the American consumer; we like to spend money,” she said.

http://money.cnn.com/2011/03/09/pf/consumers_prefer_luxury/

September 20, 2010

Luxury.com

They were late to the Internet, but brands like Ralph Lauren, Hermès and Tiffany are now making a real splash with their Websites. Some winning features: Live fashion shows, edgy blogs and Q&As with trendsetters. Oh, and nice merchandise. We rank the 10 best sites and window shop at upstarts like ideeli and Gilt.

By Jay Palmer
Barron’s 
Saturday, September 18, 2010

With lean times discouraging conspicuous consumption even among those who can afford it, the posh stores on Los Angeles’ Rodeo Drive, New York’s Madison Avenue, Paris’ Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honore and London’s New Bond Street all have been feeling the pinch.

But there’s one road where luxury sales suddenly are booming: the digital highway. As global sales of high-end goods dropped 20% last year, the category’s online sales jumped by at least 10%, and still are climbing.

It’s not that the well-to-do are only now discovering the Internet. Far from it; wealthy baby boomers were online pioneers. Instead, it’s the makers and sellers of luxury products who are finally getting comfortable with the ‘Net.

“To suggest the Internet had an important role to play in the rarefied world of luxury used to be an act of misplaced bravery, or outright heresy,” says Mark Dunhill, CEO of Faberge. “Today, however, all the major players in this sector are falling over themselves in a rush to embrace the online world.”

In other words they’re not walking on eggshells anymore, not even of the Faberge variety. From Burberry to Louis Vuitton, from Bergdorf Goodman to Tiffany, big-name brands and retailers are setting up inviting, and sometimes dazzling, Websites. At the same time, a whole new generation of online retailers such as Gilt and Ideeli are offering fresh deals every day on a wide array of luxury goods.

“Whether its diamond necklaces, designer cocktail dresses, opulent fur coats or trendy name-brand handbags and shoes, it is now no more than a mouse-click away,” says Milton Pedraza, CEO of New York’s Luxury Institute, a research firm focused on high-net-worth consumers. “Some categories are smaller and some are bigger. But overall, Internet sales account for perhaps 15% of luxury revenue. And as the Websites get better and the industry gains expertise, that could rise to over 40% within five years.”

That’s probably not a stretch.Unlike the early days of the Web, when Amazon.com and its ilk had to attract shoppers to an entirely new way of buying, consumers, especially well-heeled ones, now are now well-schooled in maneuvering online shopping-carts.

“Some of the wealthiest people around are from the leading decade of baby boomers, and these are the people who are the right age to be especially comfortable with computers,” says Susan Lyne, CEO of Gilt Groupe. Her Website offers discounts of as much as 70% on select luxury items in 36-hour sales. To provide a sense of exclusivity, Gilt requires that shoppers become members, which they can do only by invitation — but it offers invitations generously, and there are no fees.

Sites like that are a natural for any upscale consumer who doesn’t like fighting the crowds, and who takes pride in saving a buck.

Says Pedraza: “Wealthy shoppers are usually the best educated, the best connected and the most entrepreneurial. They are tech savvy, ready to appreciate the ease and convenience of buying online.”

The manufacturers and retailers of high-end wares increasingly get the message. Forrester Research says that of the nearly 200 global luxury firms they survey regularly, only a third sold merchandise on the Internet in 2008; today more than two-thirds do so, or are trying to do so.

Just about everyone who launches into Web selling assumes that there are some things that shoppers, rich or poor, wouldn’t be too keen to buy without first smelling, touching or tasting. But in practice, such items are proving few and far between. What sells and what doesn’t sell isn’t always predictable.

Expensive perfumes, exotic foods and snappy clothing are among the categories in which Internet traffic is high. So too are luxury-hotel getaways, rare vintage wines and jewelry fit for a princess.

Then again, some seemingly Web-ready products are proving to be tough sells. Although it’s now easy to sit down at your computer and select options for a BMW or a Benz, few people are driving off digital sales lots; they prefer to kick real tires and meet dealers in the flesh. Nor are luxury timepieces from the likes of Rolex, Breitling and Philippe Patek big sellers on the Web, partly because the watch makers fear antagonizing their traditional distributors.

Many luxury brands initially saw the Web as little more than a sales outlet for excess inventory. But the severity of the recession pushed them to look for new revenue wherever they could, and that meant taking the Internet more seriously. Furthermore, the cost of doing business the classic way has continued to climb, especially for luxury brands looking to build new bricks-and-mortar stores.

“A sophisticated Web store can be created for a few-hundred-thousand dollars now,” says one luxury executive who didn’t want to be identified. “That’s less than the legal fees to review a lease for a new store.” Adds Dunhill of Faberge: “The price of a piece of real estate on any prestigious luxury street or shopping mall around the world has become prohibitive to all but the wealthiest brands. The cost of creating a presence online is less intimidating.”

None of which is to say online luxury sales are a cinch. Most purveyors of luxe are still unsure exactly how to blend their image with the reality that the Internet is a mass-market selling forum. They have been slow off the mark and have a long way to go before their presentations catch up with top ‘Net retailers like Amazon, Expedia and Netflix, whose sites are comprehensive and easy to use. With only a few exceptions, existing luxury Websites tend to be heavier on glitter than on utility, blending music with high-quality photographs of products placed in up-market settings (think Tuscan villas and gardens).

On Prada’s site, for instance, which opens with singer Katey Judd’s sexy rendition of “Fever,” it’s hard to find the e-store amid the other info, including links to fashion catalogs, videos of runway shows and the Fondazione Prada, which publishes books and sponsors art installations.

But the luxury sites are steadily improving. Most have added editorial features, including fashion blogs and videos. Nordstrom, for example, displays photos of customers showing the clothes they chose for work, home life and weddings. Better still, the company broke down its traditional walls, tying its Website into its full inventory. If there is just one handbag available of a particular style, even if it’s on the other side of the country, a shopper would still see it come up as available online, ready to be shipped.

Gucci has managed to create a site that is both stylish and easy to browse. Though you can’t rotate images, you can view them from four different angles and quickly surf through lines of matching accessories. Another well-regarded success story is Louis Vuitton, the maker of leather goods and clothes. Unlike many of its peers, it offers nearly all its products on the Web.

The biggest innovation in online luxury retailing is the development of start-ups such as Gilt, Ideeli, HauteLook, Swirl and scores more. They sell designer clothing and shoes, electronic gadgets, home furniture and furnishings, tableware and luxury vacations, including accommodations at resorts and plush city-center hotels. The prices are often fantastic and on one, Rent The Runway, you not only can buy clothing but rent it for short periods.

These start-ups have been attracting big-money investors and may eventually go public. Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a venture-capital firm that backed Google and Amazon, has put money into One Kings Lane, a site selling home decor. Gilt Groupe got its start with $55 million from Matrix Partners.

“Luxury online is open to a potentially bigger audience than luxury brick-and-mortar stores,” says Paul Hurley, CEO of Ideeli. “You can reach everyone everywhere who has a computer, including those who are maybe not especially rich, but in this particular case want to buy luxury. Everything is super-convenient, and this is an entirely new retail channel that is in my view ideal for luxury goods.”

The new sites are offering far more than clothing. Last week, Gilt Groupe’s Jetsetter subsidiary was selling a South African tour ($5,800), a plush Jamaican resort ($180 a night) and the Berlin Grand Hyatt ($180 a night). The only real drawback: Nearly all sales are nonrefundable.

The major brands and retailers are making some clear progress on their own Websites. Just look at the 10 in our ranking on this page. As the sites work to perfect their presentations — from the background music to the blogs about luxe living and tools for zooming in on merchandise — they are sure to attract and keep more shoppers. With a little more competition from the likes of Gilt and Ideeli, they may even start trimming their prices.

In the discriminating world of luxury, the Internet might yet become the most luxurious place to shop.

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052970204914704575489824199921124.html

August 12, 2010

Social networking and luxury

Larry Pimentel, President and CEO of Azamara Club Cruises 05 August 2010

It once was thought that online social networking was the exclusive digital playground of kids and job hunters. But increasingly social networking is proving to be one of the most powerful channels to deliver personalised marketing messages directly to luxury consumers.

As a travel professional, you know that you need to engage your clients wherever they are located. And right now they are flocking to online social networking websites. Are you feeling a bit intimidated by social networking? Don’t be! You can easily embrace the channel to elevate relationships with your clients and market luxury travel to a select audience.

There are more than 120 million active users of Facebook in the USA alone. Luxury brands such as Gucci, Louis Vuitton and Tiffany & Co have tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of devoted “friends” on this channel. Even on Twitter, approximately 20 percent of “tweets” mention a brand somewhere in their text.

Still think your clients are not engaged in online social networking? In a recent survey conducted by the Luxury Institute, 72 percent of consumers with an average household income of $415,000 said they belong to a social networking site, with Facebook and Twitter ranking among the top three fastest growing sites. There also is plenty of room in this realm for you to start a conversation about up-market and prestige brands with a potential client.

So why is social networking so “hot”? Like other media, social networking helps you tell a story. But what differentiates this new channel is that it helps tell the story in real time as it unfolds. The immediacy of social networking channels makes you the “insider” and the “go-to” expert.” They also help you efficiently communicate with a large number of clients simultaneously.

Social networking also gets your audience, and your clients, involved. It invites them to engage in a discussion with you and your other clients in a forum that you’ve created, helping you to build and enhance your client relationships on a whole new level.

Through the proliferation of smartphones with social networking capabilities, such as iPhones and Blackberries, your clients can now receive and respond to your Facebook and Twitter updates wherever they are, whenever they want. Up to 30 million active Facebook users access the service through a mobile device. Now you’re doing mobile marketing!

Many of these social networking websites are very user-friendly and do not require technical expertise, so almost anyone can do it. All you need to do is sign up and start posting. Be sure to invite all of your clients to “like” your Facebook page and “follow” your Twitter feeds. If you have a blog, add a button that allows visitors to join your social network with just one click. And while you’re doing that, be sure to “retweet” your Facebook update and post your tweets on your Facebook page. In this way, you can connect with people in the various communications channels that you own.

Keep things fresh with regular updates, but stay on topic. Creating a store of interesting discussion topics can be very simple. Ask your friends and followers what their opinions are on a luxury travel news item that you saw during your morning headline searches, or briefly recount a memorable luxury travel experience that you can deliver again. Someone may ask you to tell them more, and that someone may become a new client.

Social networking sites also are great channels to gather intelligence about what your clients are thinking about certain topics. Spark a conversation by asking a question like what port city offers the best fine dining. Or survey your friends and followers to see what they think will be the top exotic region to visit next season.

Of course, timely responses to your Facebook friends and Twitter followers are critical to your social networking success. In the luxury sector, you know that service is a prerequisite. Responding to feedback from your Facebook friends and Twitter followers is an extension of that high-touch service. This, in turn, represents an opportunity for you to create a new relationship or foster an established one.

Though the internet is not a new space, engaging luxury travel clients through social networking is a new way of doing business. Luxury brands are flourishing through social networking and luxury consumers are paying attention – perhaps even more than the average consumer. Are you the one who can help them find an enriching experience in their search for information through social networking? In the end, if you don’t engage your clients in the places where they are, someone else most certainly will.

http://www.marketingweb.co.za/marketingweb/view/marketingweb/en/page71621?oid=129078&sn=Marketingweb%20detail&pid=71616

May 4, 2010

French Dressing: Louis Vuitton

April 29, 2010
Wall Street Journal Magazine

Is there a logo with a better pedigree, or a more resilient lifeline, than the LV of Louis Vuitton? A look at the 156-year-old brand.

As brands go, Louis Vuitton is up there with the best. In fact it may be the best if you are talking about global recognition and plaudits in the style stakes. But like anything with longevity, the regal LV initials (first stamped across leather trunks favored by royalty) have had their ups and downs in the cool stakes. The downs were mostly when the economy was “up” during the mid ’90s and early 2000s when, like all the major luxury brands, Vuitton experimented with “masstige”-creating gateway products for the aspirational to buy into. Despite this and having a product that’s notoriously easy to counterfeit (a recent court ruling making it easier for LV to go after companies that use its trademarks in Web advertisements to sell fake bags will help), luxury analysts and marketing consultants agree that the company has managed to shore up both ends of its market in a way that no other luxury brand-not even Gucci, Hermès nor Chanel- has done. (Vuitton is so canny that it has the solidity to take risks in potentially unsettled markets: It recently opened a store in Ulan Bator, the capital city of Mongolia, which has been betting on mining contracts to bring a rush of wealth to its emerging economy.)

“Ubiquity tends to be the antithesis of luxury,” says Milton Pedraza, CEO of the Luxury Institute, a consulting and analysis firm. “That hasn’t happened with LV. It’s no longer that little restaurant with no name that only you know about, but it still appeals to a huge number of people around the globe.”

But the value of a real “winner” in the global luxury stakes is whether a brand can withstand the slings and arrows of the outrageous fortune and attention that are bestowed upon it and still come out with its reputation unsullied. It’s a testament to Louis Vuitton (bought by LVMH CEO Bernard Arnault in 1989) that the moment it looked somewhat, shall we say, “available,” the company reinvigorated the logo.

To read the complete article, visit http://magazine.wsj.com/features/phenomenon/french-dressing/

Older Posts »