Luxury Institute News

October 26, 2012

March 14, 2012

What’s with the luxury brand executive switch-up?

By Rachel Lamb
Luxury Daily
March 13, 2012

Quite a few luxury brands including Givenchy, Tory Burch, Fisker, Yves Saint Laurent and Tod’s are shifting around major executives, making experts wonder whether this bodes well or poorly for the industry.

A change in executives can be refreshing – it gives a brand a fresh set of eyes and ideas and could yank out a toxic leader. However, the process of choosing new executives is crucial because the incoming leader must align himself or herself with a brand’s values and personality to succeed.

“Executives have weathered through the recession and people are a little fatiqued,” said Milton Pedraza, CEO of the Luxury Institute, New York. “Brands are looking for new skills – international, customer experience, digital, but there are always lots of changes.

“After the recession, people are tired and they want a change of pace,” he said. “I think that most brands are becoming more customer-centric, which is a new thing for luxury brands, and very important.”

Switching it up
Luxury brand executive switch-ups have frequented fashion and finance news sites over the past few months.

For example, former Chrysler chief executive Tom LaSorda was named CEO of Fisker Automotive.

Mr. LaSorda was named vice chairman of the company in December after he left Chrysler in 2009.

Meanwhile, former co-chair of Tory Burch, Chris Burch, also stepped down this past month, leaving ex-wife, creative director and brand namesake Tory Burch as the sole chair of the company.

Mr. Burch is a shareholder, but he is allegedly looking to sell his remaining shares, according to the New York Post.

Additionally, Sebastian Suhl was tapped by LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton’s Givenchy as its new CEO.

This move could be considered shots fired, since Mr. Suhl left rival Prada Group for LVMH.

That said, LVMH frequently switches around executives in the family.

For example, there is talk of current Louis Vuitton creative director Marc Jacobs moving to sister brand Christian Dior.

However, Yves Saint Laurent announced yesterday that former Dior Homme executive Hedi Slimane is returning to PPR from LVMH.

“The luxury business is pretty incestuous,” said Pam Danziger, president of Unity Marketing, Stephens, PA. “People tend to cross paths, work with [and] then work against each other throughout their careers.

“It is no wonder that when one person starts to move that sets up a chain of people switching up [and] moving around,” she said.

“While the press on the luxury brands still remains very positive, the fact is the growth we are seeing is coming at a high price to other competitors.

“So brands are looking for any edge they can get, and sometimes they see getting an executive from the competitor’s ranks will do the trick.”

Follow the leader
Although stealing a high-powered leader from a competing brand could irk other leaders, the process of selecting an executive is crucial to maintaining the brand DNA and image.

“Good brand stewards will understand the brand DNA, but they will also realize that the brand is bigger than they are,” Luxury Institute’s Mr. Pedraza said. “All of the changes and improvements need to be in alignment with the brand image.”

Some brand executives have severely embarrassed brands and collaborations.

For example, former Dior creative director Galliano was allegedly caught on tape spewing religious, racial and ethnic insults, according to various reports. In addition to losing his tenure position at Dior, he was also unable to continue working at the self-labeled brand John Galliano, which is also owned by Dior.

However embarrassing its former employee was for Dior and LVMH, the brands still thrive today.

It is the board leaders’ job to make cuts and decisions about executives who could fatally hurt a brand’s image.

However, this does not just include axing creative directors who insult people on camera. There are a variety of other choices to make when creating a brand director.

“Leaders who are toxic or whose skills are obsolete should not be hired,” Mr. Pedraza said. “Also, leaders who are not adaptable do not have a place.

“I think that people want inspirational leaders now, not authoritative and selfish,” he said. “Leaders who have a bigger purpose in building brands and companies and are not just out there to get money are who we need to look out for.”

http://www.luxurydaily.com/what%E2%80%99s-with-the-luxury-brand-executive-switch-up/

May 19, 2011

Sell Your Sole

Christian Louboutin’s red lacquer sole is even more valuable than you think

By Robert Klara
Adweek
May 18, 2011

You’re not likely to quicken the pulse of many fashionable women by mentioning Registration No. 902955, Pantone 18.1663TP, Class 25. But you’ll probably get much further by translating what this identification code—currently in the files of the World Intellectual Property Organization’s headquarters in Geneva—means to female shoppers around the world: a pair of Christian Louboutins.

More precisely, a pair of Louboutins with a red-lacquer sole. Infact, there is no other kind. The chic Parisian cobbler first slapped alittle red paint on the bottoms of his pumps
and platforms back in1993. Since then, his irreverent designs have used everything from toundra fur to blue Austrian crystals. But it’s those shiny, inevitable red soles that have become a veritable trademark.

Make that a literal trademark. Louboutin’s attorneys secured the rights to the red-lacquer sole in 2008, both in the U.S. and in the 75 other countries that observe WIPO’s conventions. It’s just too bad the designer waited so long, because—as the selection on page 2 demonstrates—several other brands have been making red-soled shoes, too. Last month, Louboutin put his foot down, filing separate suits in Manhattan Federal Court against Yves Saint Laurent and Carmen Steffens for their forbidden use of la semelle rouge.

While neither Louboutin nor YSL responded to requests for comment, Mark Willingham, president of U.S. operations for Carmen Steffens, says red is theirs to use as much as green or purple or canary yellow. “Over the years, we’ve incorporated almost every color imaginable into our footwear soles—including various tones of red,” he says. “It’s part of our brand’s DNA.”

So we’ve obviously got a fight brewing here, and despite how petty it might look, the dispute actually reaches to the core of what it means to create a brand. Alan C. Drewsen, executive director of the International Trademark Association, points out that if Louboutin fails to protect his trademark now, imitators may eventually leave him with nothing to protect at all. “Aspirin and Cellophane were once trademarks that weren’t adequately defended,” he says. “Now they’re generic.” The other core component is color itself: How a certain hue, used in a certain way, can create an icon of fashion.

According to Michael Shaw, a patent attorney with the London intellectual-property firm of Marks & Clerk, it’s only been possible for a brand to trademark a color since 1996, and it’s never been easy. “It [must] be shown that the color has acquired a highly distinctive character as a result of substantial use,” he says. (Rare examples: Tiffany & Co.’s trademark of the robin’s egg blue gift box and Owens Corning’s mark for pink fiberglass insulation.) “Generally speaking, colors don’t function as trademarks,” adds New York Law School professor Dan Hunter. “But they can with enough use, enough marketing, and enough consumer recognition. Which is what happened with red-soled Louboutin shoes.”

But in Louboutin’s case, there’s an X factor that goes beyond what his lawyers will have to prove in court (which is that the competing red soles are likely to cause consumer confusion between the brands). Women don’t drop $1,000 on a pair of CLs because they happen to like red under their feet; they do it because they like what that red represents. “I talked to a very successful businesswoman about this the other day,” relates Milton Pedraza, CEO of the Luxury Institute. “And she said, ‘Of course that red sole matters. It signals to the world that I wear Louboutins—a top-of-the-line shoe. It [says] I’m a successful woman, and I bought these myself, that I’m powerful—and still feminine.”

Christian Louboutin probably didn’t set out to create a product with socio-sexual overtones as complex as that, but it’s part of what he’s defending in court right now. “That sole has a lot of messaging embedded in it,” Pedraza says. “It’s about the emancipation of women in the corporate suite.”

http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/sell-your-sole-131602?page=1

March 9, 2010

What Chinese Shoppers Want

Forbes.com
Evelyn Rusli
March 8, 2010

Luxury goods makers find growth in China.

“Fashion fades, only style remains the same,” says Jasper Liu, 26, summarizing his approach to shopping by quoting Coco Chanel.

Liu, a self-described “Shanghai Hipster,” represents the nouveau riche of China. He reads English literature, watches European movies, drinks fine champagne and is a loyal patron of luxury retailers, namely Lanvin and Yves Saint Laurent.

The affection is mutual: Fashion houses with global ambitions are courting Chinese consumers like Jasper, eager to learn how they spend, why they spend and just how much they’re willing to spend.

The answer: quite a lot if the quality and label are right. In a recent study by retail consulting firm Pao Principle, the average Chinese luxury consumer will spend roughly 11% of her income on luxury handbags alone. The group’s favorite brands, in order of preference: Louis Vuitton, Gucci, Coach, Chanel and Prada.

Over the past year Patti Pao, the founder of Pao Principle, has collected data on the mainland’s elite consumers: amassing a panel of 356 individuals who have purchased a luxury handbag, watch or fine jewelry piece in the last twelve months. Her snapshots of their habits create a portrait of a misunderstood luxury consumer who is highly educated and highly motivated to identify products that will complement his or her individuality and rising power.

For Pao the project was critical to her business. After the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, her retail clients fled, “I said, what would it take for you to hire us back, and they basically said, ‘The U.S. is dead, Europe is dead, Japan is dead and we’re putting all our resources in either the Middle East or in China. If you can help us … we’d be happy to speak with you again.’” The mature markets may not be “dead,” but numbers confirm that momentum is indeed swinging: According to an October 2009 Bain & Company report, the U.S. luxury market likely fell 16% that year, Europe was off 8%— but China, which is described as the “new real frontier of luxury,” rose an estimated 12%.

And according to the Luxury Institute’s latest report on the high-end market (released in September 2009) 33% of respondents said they plan to spend less on handbags this year. “Even the wealthiest of consumers are now living within their means, which will have a somber, dampening effect on the market,” says Luxury Institute’s CEO, Milton Pedraza.

“U.S. consumers who are making $150,000 or more, spend about $3,000 a year on handbags, which is a pittance compared to the Chinese.” For comparison, 90% of Pao’s panelists who had purchased a handbag in the past 12 months are planning or considering the purchase of another luxury bag in the next six months.

For Western companies China can be a difficult market to crack due to its language barrier and inherently private culture. In a nation still challenged by censorship issues, Pao says people are generally hesitant to share personal and honest information. But Pao, a Chinese-American whose parents are from Nanjing, says her ties to mainland China gave her a natural advantage. “All of our correspondence was done in Mandarin. We leveraged our network of friends and families, so that we were able to hand select and hand screen a panel…who because we knew them or were tied to them in some way shape or form would tell us the truth.”

That panel is highly educated and has serious spending power: 70% graduated from college, with many holding advanced degrees: 80% own a own home; and nearly 90% bought a luxury handbag in the last 12 months. The average annual salary of a panelist is 125,000 yuan, or $18,382–which may seem low compared with U.S. wages, but is more than triple the average salary in Shanghai, which is 39,000 yuan or $5,735, and goes a lot further in China. Many of the panelists are young, college graduates from wealthy families who recently entered the work force. While their means seem modest compared to luxury buyers in the U.S., Pao found that many outspend their Western counterparts, dollar for dollar. Of the 311 panelists who bought a handbag in the last 12 months, the average purchase price per bag was $1,000 and the average panelist bought two bags, according to Pao’s data.

China’s lust for luxury may seem a pure power play, a competition to amass the greatest number of logos, but Pao says it has become more nuanced than that. As Chinese consumers become more sophisticated and savvy, they’re using fashion to differentiate themselves and project a personal statement. Twenty years ago people bought luxury goods because it signified how successful they were: “Literally, you were judged by the clothes that you wore on your back,” she says. “The trend is shifting, because in the 1970s China enacted the one-child policy,” Pao says. “Now China has a population of very wealthy households. [Their] children are cosseted, coveted, pampered … they’re self-centered and they’re spoiled,” says Pao. “It’s just how they describe themselves.”

As a result the country has moved away from a group-think mentality to a more individual-centered mindset. Luxury products that offer an opportunity for differentiation, such as limited editions, are highly sought after by her panelists, including “Shanghai Hipster” Liu. He admits China’s consumers are more brand-oriented but says that only “unsophisticated luxury shoppers would select luxuries with visible logos to show off their new ‘conquest.’ ”

Pao’s report concludes that the country’s wealthy consumers and its aspirational class are willing to spend money (while scrimping and saving if necessary) to buy the finest goods, but they are more discerning than ever. Pao warns that China can no longer be used as a dumping ground for excess inventory and says designers will have to create limited editions exclusively for the market.

The Chinese consumer understands that “after 2009 they’re going to be the number one consumer of luxury goods in the world,” Pao says. “And they’re expecting acknowledgment for that.”

http://www.forbes.com/2010/03/08/china-shoppers-luxury-markets-equities-lifestyle.html